Variation of simple Lagrangian

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bndnchrs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Variation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the variation of a Lagrangian in the context of gauge symmetries in Quantum Field Theory (QFT). The participant explores how to handle the complex conjugate of the field during the variation process, specifically when taking the derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to the field and its conjugate. They suggest treating the complex conjugate as an independent field to derive the equations of motion. Additionally, they propose decomposing the complex field into two real fields to simplify the variation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with gauge symmetries
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Experience with complex fields and their variations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of gauge invariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the variation of Lagrangians in field theory
  • Explore the decomposition of complex fields into real fields
  • Investigate the derivation of equations of motion from Lagrangian formulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Field Theory and gauge symmetries, will benefit from this discussion.

bndnchrs
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm doing some examples in QFT and I don't want to go too far with this one:

Doing gauge symmetries, we first introduce the Unitary spacetime-dependent gauge transformation that gives us a gauge potential. With the new gauge added Lagrangian, I want to take its variation to confirm the equations of motion. Here's my question.

When we take [tex]\frac{d}{d \phi} -m^2\phi^*\phi[/tex] for example...

how do we handle the complex conjugate through our variation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you take it as an independent field, so you take the variation of the lagrangian with respect to phi (giving one equation) and with respect to phi* (giving another equation).

If this construction troubles you, you can decompose phi into two real fields,
[tex]\phi = \phi_1 + i \phi_2[/tex]
and obtain the two equations by taking the variation with respect to phii (i = 1, 2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K