I Variation of the Liar's Paradox

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a variation of the Liar's Paradox, specifically the statement "Statistics are wrong 90% of the time," which appears self-refuting. Participants explore the implications of this claim, noting that if it is true, it must also be false, creating a paradox. However, some argue that the lack of certainty (less than 100%) allows for the possibility of the statement being true without creating a true paradox. The conversation also touches on the statement "Statistics are wrong 50% of the time," which is viewed as less paradoxical due to its even odds. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the paradox dissolves when considering the nature of probability and truth.
rmberwin
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
A variation of the Liar's Paradox occurred to me: "Statistics are wrong 90% of the time". This statement seems to refute itself, but does so in a less straightforward way. I would appreciate any insights! And what about, "Statistics are wrong 50% of the time"? (Even odds.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rmberwin said:
A variation of the Liar's Paradox occurred to me: "Statistics are wrong 90% of the time". This statement seems to refutes itself, but does so in a less straightforward way. I would appreciate any insights! And what about the statement, "Statistics are wrong 50% of the time"? (Even odds.)
This makes utterly no sense to me.
 
rmberwin said:
A variation of the Liar's Paradox occurred to me: "Statistics are wrong 90% of the time". This statement seems to refutes itself, but does so in a less straightforward way. I would appreciate any insights! And what about the statement, "Statistics are wrong 50% of the time"? (Even odds.)
Anything less than a certainty of 100% removes the paradox. It leaves the possibility that the statement is true.
 
FactChecker said:
Anything less than a certainty of 100% removes the paradox. It leaves the possibility that the statement is true.
But if the statement is true, then it is probably (90%) false. That is the paradox.
 
rmberwin said:
But if the statement is true, then it is probably (90%) false. That is the paradox.
"Probably" is not the same as definitely. That is why it is not a paradox.
I could say that I am 26,823 days old and probably be wrong. But maybe not.
 
rmberwin said:
But if the statement is true, then it is probably (90%) false. That is the paradox.
If the statement is true, then it is one of the 10% of true statements. No paradox.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes FactChecker

Similar threads

I Help us calculate the likelihood an intelligent alien species exists!
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Are Time-Travel and Logical Paradoxes Connected?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Observational Studies: What to Believe
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Tell me how scientific journals scrutinize statistical work
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Question: Proposed Solution to Two Envelope Paradox
Replies
29
Views
3K
I What is the probability that the product of the digits is odd?
Replies
13
Views
2K
B Convince Covid-19 Vaccine Efficiency Through Statistics
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Making Sense of Notation Confusion in Statistical Digital Signal Processing
Replies
6
Views
2K
I What Are the Key Differences Between OLS and GLM Models in Statistical Analysis?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I A variation of the sleeping beauty problem
2
Replies
57
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top