Vector equation for a line segment in 3 dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vector equation for a line segment from the point (2, -1, 4) to (4, 6, 1) can be expressed as v(t) = (1-t) * a + t * b, where a = (2, -1, 4) and b = (4, 6, 1) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. An alternative approach presented in the discussion involves using the formula <4-2t, 6-7t, 1+3t>, which is valid but represents the line segment in reverse direction. The direction of the vector is crucial, as it determines the orientation of the line segment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with parametric equations
  • Knowledge of line segments in three-dimensional space
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of vector equations for line segments in 3D space
  • Learn about parametric equations and their applications in geometry
  • Explore the implications of directionality in vector equations
  • Investigate the differences between various forms of vector representations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector calculus, educators teaching geometry, and anyone interested in understanding vector equations in three-dimensional space.

Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1).


Homework Equations


Arithmetic :p


The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was that I simply solved for the distance between the two points and used it as my vector, I then said

<4-2t, 6-7t, 1+3t> when 0≤t≤1

The book didn't do anything like this at all. They threw in some weird formula that seems like it complicated everything for no reason at all. Is my way of doing it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the formula the book threw in ?
Your solution appears to be in the vector form of a line.

Namely:
$$<x_0, y_0, z_0>+t < a, b, c>$$
 
Last edited:
Yeah, well isn't that exactly what they were looking for?
They thew in some (1-t)<vector> + <vector2>. Whatever. I'm not interested in their way as I found a much more intuitive way of doing it on sladder. I was just curious if my answer is OK. It gives the exact same result as their does but it's in a different format.
 
Feodalherren said:
Yeah, well isn't that exactly what they were looking for?
They thew in some (1-t)<vector> + <vector2>. Whatever. I'm not interested in their way as I found a much more intuitive way of doing it on sladder. I was just curious if my answer is OK. It gives the exact same result as their does but it's in a different format.

The segment from ##\vec{a}## to ##\vec{b}## has the form
\vec{v} = \vec{v}(t) \equiv (1-t) \vec{a} + t \vec{b}, \; 0 \leq t \leq 1.
When ##t = 0## we have ##\vec{v} =\vec{a}## and when ##t = 1## we have ##\vec{v} = \vec{b}##.

Note that just saying ##\vec{v} = \vec{a} + t \vec{b}## won't work (why not?).
 
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1).
...

The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was that I simply solved for the distance between the two points and used it as my vector, I then said

<4-2t, 6-7t, 1+3t> when 0≤t≤1

The book didn't do anything like this at all. They threw in some weird formula that seems like it complicated everything for no reason at all. Is my way of doing it wrong?
For one thing your solution goes from (4,6,1) to (2,-1,4) as t goes from 0 to 1 .

... if that makes any difference.
 
SammyS said:
For one thing your solution goes from (4,6,1) to (2,-1,4) as t goes from 0 to 1 .

... if that makes any difference.

Okay, does it matter? It's still the same line, just drawn in a different direction.
 
Feodalherren said:
Okay, does it matter? It's still the same line, just drawn in a different direction.
Tha'ts up to you. You said "Find the vector equation for a line segment from (2,-1,4) to (4,6,1)." Was the "from", "to" important?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I guess it matters then. Didn't really think about that. Thanks.
 
Feodalherren said:
I guess it matters then. Didn't really think about that. Thanks.

Even if direction is important, your initial solution is good if t goes from 1 to 0 .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Easy fix! I like it, thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K