Vector Proofs: A Quadrilateral thing

  • Thread starter Thread starter forevergone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that if the diagonals of a quadrilateral bisect each other, then the quadrilateral is a parallelogram. The subject area is geometry, specifically vector proofs related to properties of quadrilaterals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches to the proof, including the use of congruent triangles and vector relationships. Questions about how to manipulate given equations and definitions of parallelograms are raised.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the proof using vector relationships and congruence, while others are exploring different interpretations and methods. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, with some expressing frustration over their attempts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention prior knowledge from geometry tests and the challenge of applying vector proofs specifically, indicating a constraint in their approach. There is also a reference to the importance of translating verbal descriptions into symbolic representations.

forevergone
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Vector Proofs: A Quadrilateral thing #2!

Thanks lightgrav!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


forevergone said:
I need some help trying to prove that if the diagonals of a quadrilateral bisect each other, the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.
I've been attacking this problem for hours but its no good :\.

We had that problem on a geometry test in 9th grade, I will try digging it up and show you how :smile: ...if I can find it of course :rolleyes:
 
Any help is always appreciated!
 
you're given that dz = zb and az = zc , as your starting point.

What sums and differences of these equations show what you want?
 
az + zb = ab
cz + zd = cd

but az = zb, cz = cd therefore ab = cd!

Bah! That took like 5 minutes to see when I was spending 5 hours worth of time on it.

Thanks!
 
The key to this stuff is writing in symbols
JUST WHAT they tell you in words.

That's why everybody calls these things "Word Problems"!
 
But a new problem arises :\.
 
One way to do this is to show that you have a pair of congruent triangles. (There are actually several pair, but you only need one.) Remember the definition of a parallelogram - that'll give you the angles. There's one more property of parallelograms that will give you the sides that you need.
 
Diane_ said:
One way to do this is to show that you have a pair of congruent triangles. (There are actually several pair, but you only need one.) Remember the definition of a parallelogram - that'll give you the angles. There's one more property of parallelograms that will give you the sides that you need.

I need to do this through vector proofs, though. If I could use congruent triangles, I would've been long done this problem :).
 
  • #10
You just have to show that 1/2(dc+da) = 1/2db. that means that the middle of db touches the middle of ac. This is easy to prove. Start with the two equations:
db = da + ab
db = dc + cb
and try to solve for 1/2(dc+da) in terms of db.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
995
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K