Vector Space Q: Is Additive Identity Unique?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 3K views
bjgawp
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Just wondering. Suppose we some plane, any plane like [tex]S = \{ (x_1, x_2, x_3) \in F^{3} \ : \ x_1 + 5x_2 + 3x_3 = 0 \}[/tex] where F is either [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] or [tex]\mathbb{C}[/tex] . We know that S is a vector space (passes the origin).

We know that [tex](0,0,0)[/tex] is the additive identity and it should be unique by virtue of the field we're working with. But say we had any arbitrary vector [tex](a,b,c)[/tex]. Wouldn't [tex](-a, -b, -c)[/tex] or [tex](0, 3, -5)[/tex] also be counted as an additive identity as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(-a, -b, -c) would be the inverse under addition.

the other (0,3,-5), forgot what's it called, I think the kernel if I'm not mistaken
 
But wouldn't they also be the additive identity /zero vector as well, violating the fact zero vectors of vector spaces are unique?
 
Given an identity 0, and a vector v

v + 0 = v

but

v + (0,3,-5) does not equal vso it's not an identity, it's a vector that maps to zero, but it's not zero.
 
Doesn't it though for v in S?

Let [tex]v = (a,b,c) = a + 5b + 3c \in S[/tex]. Then [tex](a + 5b + 3c) + (0 + 5(3) + 3(-5)) = (a + 5b + 3c) + (0) = a + 5b + 3c = v[/tex]

So we found an element [tex]w = (0, 3, -5)[/tex] such that [tex]v + w = v[/tex] which by definition, we call w the additive inverse?
 
I was wrong about the kernel thing, because you need to have a map for that.

You just have a vector space that is constrained to S:

[tex] \ x_1 + 5x_2 + 3x_3 = 0 \[/tex]meaning that the components of every element of S have to satisfy this equation.
 
Not quite sure if I entirely understand. Wouldn't any element in S then be called an additive identity since adding it to any vector v would just simply give us v.?
 
bjgawp,

I think you may be a little confused. Since you are in a 3 dimensional space, each vector contains three components, including the zero vector. So let
[tex]\mathbf{v} = \left(a,b,c\right) \in S[/tex], and let
[tex]\mathbf{w} = \left(0,3,-5\right)[/tex], where of course
[tex]\mathbf{w} \in S[/tex] as well. When we add these, we get
[tex]\mathbf{v} + \mathbf{w} = \left(a+0, b+3, c-5 \right)[/tex].

For example, if [tex]\mathbf{v} = \left(1,-2,3\right)[/tex]
then [tex]\mathbf{v} + \mathbf{w} = \left(1, 1, -2 \right)[/tex].

Also note that if [tex]\mathbf{u} = \left(0,-3,5\right)[/tex],
then
[tex]\mathbf{v} + \mathbf{u} = \left(0+0, 3-3, -5+5 \right) <br /> = \left(0,0,0 \right) = \mathbf{0}[/tex]. Note that the
vector [tex]\mathbf{0} \in S[/tex]
is not the same as the scalar [tex]0 \in F[/tex].

I hope that helps,

Jason

bjgawp said:
Doesn't it though for v in S?

Let [tex]v = (a,b,c) = a + 5b + 3c \in S[/tex]. Then [tex](a + 5b + 3c) + (0 + 5(3) + 3(-5)) = (a + 5b + 3c) + (0) = a + 5b + 3c = v[/tex]

So we found an element [tex]w = (0, 3, -5)[/tex] such that [tex]v + w = v[/tex] which by definition, we call w the additive inverse?
 
bjgawp said:
Doesn't it though for v in S?

Let [tex]v = (a,b,c) = a + 5b + 3c \in S[/tex].
NO! (a, b, c) is NOT equal to a+ 5b+ 3c and a+ 5b+ 3c is NOT in S. "(a,b,c)= a+ 5b+ 3c doesn't even make sense. One is a member of R3, the other of R1- they can't be equal! And a+ 5b+ 3c is not in S because S only contains things in R3 and a+ 5b+ 3c is not.

[/quote]Then [tex](a + 5b + 3c) + (0 + 5(3) + 3(-5)) = (a + 5b + 3c) + (0) = a + 5b + 3c = v[/tex]

So we found an element [tex]w = (0, 3, -5)[/tex] such that [tex]v + w = v[/tex] which by definition, we call w the additive inverse?[/QUOTE]
IF v= (a, b, c) is in S, then a+ 5b+ 3c= 0. If w= (0, 3, -5) then v+ w= (a, b+3, c- 5) which is NOT equal to (a, b, c). Frankly, it appears that you have no clue what
[tex]S = \{ (x_1, x_2, x_3) \in F^{3} \ : \ x_1 + 5x_2 + 3x_3 = 0 \}[/tex]
means.