1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Additive identity over linear transformation

  1. Nov 21, 2011 #1
    Given vector spaces V, W over a field, and linear transformation [itex]T:V\rightarrow W[/itex], prove [itex]T(0_{v})=0_{w} [/itex] where 0_v and 0_w are additive identities of V and W.

    I'm trying to use the definition of additive identity. So, [itex]\forall\vec{v}\in V,\vec{v}+0=\vec{v+0=0} [/itex]. Where do I go from here?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 22, 2011 #2

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I don't really see why v + 0 = 0... unless v = 0.
    However, you may want to look at v + (-v) = 0.
     
  4. Nov 22, 2011 #3
    Woops, I meant [itex]\forall\vec{v}\in V,\vec{v}+0=\vec{0+v=\vec{v}}. [/itex] Not the additive inverse.
     
  5. Nov 22, 2011 #4

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yep, I guess you can use that as well.
    You will still need the additive inverse at some point though (if not in V, then at least in W to show that T(v) - T(v) = 0W).
     
  6. Nov 22, 2011 #5
    Here's a hint: Consider [itex]T(0_v+0_v)[/itex].
     
  7. Nov 22, 2011 #6
    Would this line of reasoning work?

    [itex]T(0_{v})=T(0_{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v}-\vec{v}+0_{v})=T(0_{v}+\vec{v})-T(0_{v}+\vec{v})=T(\vec{v})-T(\vec{v})=\vec{w}-\vec{w}=0_{w}. [/itex]
     
  8. Nov 22, 2011 #7
    That looks good to me! In fact you can make it even simpler If you want by noting [itex]T(0_v)=T(0_v+0_v)=T(0_v) + T(0_v) [/itex] which is only possible if [itex]T(0_v)=?[/itex]
     
  9. Nov 22, 2011 #8
    [itex]T(0_{v})=0_{w}[/itex], or the additive identity in W?
     
  10. Nov 22, 2011 #9
    Exactly , it must be the zero of W.
     
  11. Nov 22, 2011 #10

    Fredrik

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's correct, but you're using the following two results without proving them
    • T(-x) is the additive inverse of T(x) for all x.
    • -0=0
    The first one is no more obvious than the statement you're trying to prove.

    If you're going to use these results, there's no need to involve a new vector v. You could just write [tex]T(0)=T(0+0)=T(0+(-0))=T(0)+T(-0)=T(0)-T(0)=0.[/tex] I prefer the method Theorem suggested.
     
  12. Nov 23, 2011 #11

    CompuChip

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    An alternative way to write it down is:
    T(0) = T(0 + 0) = T(0) + T(0) because of linearity.
    Now add the additive inverse of T(0) (whatever it is, but there must be one) to both sides, and you get
    T(0) + (-T(0)) = T(0) + T(0) + (-T(0))
    0 = T(0)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Additive identity over linear transformation
  1. Linear transformations (Replies: 4)

  2. Linear transformation (Replies: 4)

  3. Linear transformation (Replies: 18)

Loading...