Vegetarians are smarter than meat eaters

  • Thread starter Skyhunter
  • Start date
It is well known that intelligence is inherited, Sandon said. "In my opinion, the study does not control for that factor," she said.The study was published in the British Medical Journal.In summary, a study found that vegetarians have a slightly higher average IQ than meat-eaters, but the results are inconclusive as the study did not assess the effects of eating meat and did not control for factors such as environment and inherited intelligence. More research is needed to determine the cause and effect relationship between diet and IQ.
  • #1
Skyhunter
According to recent study, vegetarians average 5 IQ points higher than meat chompers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6180753.stm

A Southampton University team found those who were vegetarian by 30 had recorded five IQ points more on average at the age of 10.

But I already knew that. :tongue:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bah :)

So what happened to you then Sky? :smile:
 
  • #3
No great surprise, but it must be recognised that the study doesn't actually assess the effects of eating meat; it's not shown to be a cause and effect relationship.
 
  • #4
According to recent study, vegetarians average 5 IQ points higher than meat chompers.

That shouldn't be very surprising. It's much easier to be vegetarian in open-minded and intellectual environments, where smart people often end up. I'd like to see this done with more control for environment.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Veggies are paler <--- that's a Friday fact! :tongue2:
 
  • #6
Special case of cause-effect for the opposite:
Since starting to eat more meat again... I feel I've been getting smarter.
I'm eating more meat because I'm now sharing my meals with a smart man... :!) and the dialogue during such meals is making me smarter. :biggrin:
 
  • #7
10 out of 9 are fooled by statistics :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #8
First the title of the article is misleading, It states "High IQ link to being vegetarian", but then listed these scores which are low average IQ "Men who were vegetarian had an IQ score of 106, compared with 101 for non-vegetarians; while female vegetarians averaged 104, compared with 99 for non-vegetarians."

Also, eating a vegetarian diet doesn't raise your IQ, the article states that more people that tested with average IQ's (sorry 104-106 is NOT a high IQ) chose to be vegetarian, and some that claimed to be vegetartian also included chicken and fish in their diets! :bugeye:

IQ scores of 90-110 are AVERAGE. :rolleyes:

I've always been a vegetable lover, but sometimes meat is the only thing that will hit the spot.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Of course it is true. We meat-eaters are put together with that segment of the population that frequents MacDonald's..
 
  • #10
arildno said:
Of course it is true. We meat-eaters are put together with that segment of the population that frequents MacDonald's..
I don't think that's meat...:eek:
 
  • #11
But THEY don't know that, and identify themselves as meat-eaters all the same, lowering our average wrt. to the rabbits. :grumpy:
 
  • #12
arildno said:
But THEY don't know that, and identify themselves as meat-eaters all the same, lowering our average wrt. to the rabbits. :grumpy:
:rofl: :rofl:
 
  • #13
This can't be right. I'm going to have to sit me down with a rack of ribs and think on it a mite.
 
  • #14
No venison for me this year - the deer managed to elude me this season. Maybe they're smarter than me because they are vegetarians?
 
  • #15
The vegetarians scored higher on the IQ tests because they're herd animals. Didn't the experimenter notice that there were five of them all gathered around the same test paper??
 
  • #16
The study does not imply that if you become a vegetarian before you are 30, it will improve your IQ score when you were 10. What it does imply (whether it's true is another question) is that if you are hiring people and want an extra 5 IQ points without actually running an IQ test, you should choose people who were vegetarian before they were 30. That is, assuming that the advantage at 10 hasn't dissipated.
 
  • #17
DaveC is right - it's essentially a meaningless study (if you want to call it that).
 
  • #18
I wonder what the margin of error was for this study anyway?

We all know there's more vegetarians in California than hicktown or Africa. It's demographics.
 
  • #19
Evo said:
First the title of the article is misleading, It states "High IQ link to being vegetarian", but then listed these scores which are low average IQ "Men who were vegetarian had an IQ score of 106, compared with 101 for non-vegetarians; while female vegetarians averaged 104, compared with 99 for non-vegetarians."

Also, eating a vegetarian diet doesn't raise your IQ, the article states that more people that tested with average IQ's (sorry 104-106 is NOT a high IQ) chose to be vegetarian, and some that claimed to be vegetartian also included chicken and fish in their diets! :bugeye:

IQ scores of 90-110 are AVERAGE. :rolleyes:

I've always been a vegetable lover, but sometimes meat is the only thing that will hit the spot.

B]and some that claimed to be vegetartian also included chicken and fish in their diets![/B] Are these the smart, average or the below average vegetarians that included fish and chicken in their diet... of course the next question is, how much did these folks skew the data ::rolleyes:
 
  • #20
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.39030.675069.55v1"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
I love raw meat.Yummy!
Does that mean I'm dumb?

Well,one way or another,I've heard that meat-eaters are more aggresive than vegeterians.
And I don't think for myself I'm too aggressive person .
:smile:
 
  • #22
What a below-average interlligence survey. Obviously carried out by meat-eaters!

[I'm attempting the irony trifecta!]
 
  • #23
You win Chi [handing Chi a plate of my hickory-smoked BBQ pork]
 
  • #24
Mk said:
I wonder what the margin of error was for this study anyway?

Me too. I'd like to see error bars! There's a much smaller population of vegetarians, and tend to glom together, while the meat eaters are much more diverse, so I'd expect a rather large error range for the meat eaters that would entirely bracket the vegetarian range. Otherwise, as Evo pointed out, all those numbers show is that on average, people are average. :wink:
 
  • #25
Here is a more in depth article.

"This study left many unanswered questions such as: Did the vegetarian children grow up in a household with a vegetarian parent? Were meatless meals regularly served in the household? Were the children eating a primarily vegetarian diet at the age of 10?" said Lona Sandon, an assistant professor of clinical nutrition at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

"In addition, we don't know the beliefs or attitudes of the parents of the children, nor do we know if there was a particular event that led these children to becoming vegetarian in their teens or adulthood," Sandon said.

As the study showed, more women than men chose a vegetarian diet, Sandon noted. "Other research shows that women in general will focus more on their health than men. So, if they believe that a vegetarian diet will have health benefits, they are more likely to follow it," she said.

Given these factors, "we cannot draw any solid conclusions from this research," Sandon added."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20061215/hl_hsn/kidswithhighiqsgrowuptobevegetarians
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
It takes some serious mental power to convince yourself to go against your instinct and not eat meat. That is my explanation :)
 
  • #27
Of course vegetables are smarter than meat-eaters!
 
  • #28
Rach3 said:
Of course vegetables are smarter than meat-eaters!
They are crunchier too. :rofl:
 
  • #29
Anttech said:
bah :)

So what happened to you then Sky? :smile:

I am not a vegetarian.

I am vegan.
 
  • #30
brewnog said:
No great surprise, but it must be recognised that the study doesn't actually assess the effects of eating meat; it's not shown to be a cause and effect relationship.

Actually it was the average IQ a the age of 10. But I agree it is a fairly meaningless study. I just started the thread to see what the reactions here would be.
 
  • #31
Mk said:
I wonder what the margin of error was for this study anyway?

We all know there's more vegetarians in California than hicktown or Africa. It's demographics.

The study was conducted in Great Britain.
 
  • #32
Evo said:
I don't think that's meat...:eek:

I don't even think it is food.
 
  • #33
Yonoz said:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.39030.675069.55v1"

Thanks Yunoz.

Here is the whole study in PDF form.

http://press.psprings.co.uk/bmj/december/vegetarian.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
On average, vegetarians had a higher childhood IQ score
than non-vegetarians.According to sex, the mean (SD)
childhood IQ score of vegetarians compared with nonvegetarians
was 106.1 (14.7) and 100.6 (15.2) for men and 104.0
(14.1) and 99.0 (14.7) for women, differences of 5.5 and 5.0
points (P < 0.001).

So a small portion of mid-average IQ kids now claim to be vegetarian.

Kids that are now vegan had scores averaging 10 points lower, or almost in the "Dullness" category.When vegetarians were divided into those who were strictly vegetarian (no fish or meat) and those who consumed fish or
chicken, no difference was found in IQ score.Among those who
had taken vegetarianism to its logical conclusion (“gone the
whole hog,”, as it were) and become vegan (no animal products),
mean IQ scores were lower.On average, vegans had a childhood
IQ score that was nearly 10 points lower than other vegetarians:

mean (SD) IQ score 95.1 (14.8) in vegans compared with 104.8
(14.1) in other vegetarians (P = 0.04), although this estimate must
be viewed with caution as only nine participants were vegan.

IQ Range Classification

140 and over Genius or near genius
120-140 Very superior intelligence
110-120 Superior intelligence
90-110 Normal or average intelligence
80-90 Dullness
70-80 Borderline deficiency
Below 70 Definite feeble-mindedness

http://members.shaw.ca/delajara/IQBasics.html
 
  • #35
Skyhunter said:
I don't even think it is food.

Sure it is.
It's a food, a packaging wrap and a disinfectant. It just depends on what colour additive you use.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
659
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
7K
Back
Top