Velocity dependence of operators in Inonu-Wigner contraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Inonu-Wigner contraction as derived in Weinberg's QFT volume 1, specifically in section 2.4, where the Poincaré group is reduced to the Euclidean group through a low velocity limit. Key insights include the relationships between operators: W ~ mv², P ~ mv, and M ~ m, while J (angular momentum) remains constant at J ~ 1 due to its vector nature compared to the scalar nature of P. Additionally, the boost operator K is shown to have a dependence of K ~ 1/v, indicating that as one reference frame's velocity approaches zero, the effect of the boost operator increases significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the Poincaré group and its representations
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, particularly momentum and angular momentum
  • Concept of reference frames in relativistic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Inonu-Wigner contraction in detail
  • Explore the mathematical properties of the Poincaré group
  • Learn about the implications of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between reference frames and boost operators in relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of relativistic physics and operator behavior in low velocity limits.

hideelo
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
I'm reading Weinberg's QFT volume 1. At the end of section 2.4 he is deriving the Inonu-Wigner contraction where he reduces the Poincaré group to the Euclidean one by taking the low velocity limit. In analyzing how the operators depend on velocity there are some I understand and some I don't.

I understand why W ~ mv^2, P ~ mv, M ~ m. I don't understand why J ~ 1, why isn't it on the same order as P? They both have linear velocity dependence. Also why is K ~ 1/v that means that for smaller velocity the effect gets bigger. I would expect that in the limit of small velocity, boosts just aren't a thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to the first part of your question is that J (the angular momentum operator) is a vector quantity, while P (the linear momentum operator) is a scalar quantity. Therefore, J has a higher order of magnitude than P, because the components of J need to be multiplied together in order to obtain the magnitude of the vector.The answer to the second part of your question is that K (the boost operator) is related to the velocities of two reference frames with respect to one another. As the velocity of one frame approaches zero, the velocity of the other frame must increase in order to maintain a constant relative velocity. Therefore, as the velocity of one frame approaches zero, the effect of the boost operator increases.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K