Velocity of a slider in magnetic field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a slider in a magnetic field, particularly focusing on the effects of self-induction and motional electromotive force (emf) when a switch is closed in a circuit involving a capacitor. Participants explore the implications of these concepts on the velocity and acceleration of the slider.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the force acting on the slider and question the assumptions regarding self-induction and motional emf. They explore the implications of ignoring these factors on the behavior of the slider and the resulting current in the circuit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning and clarifying the role of self-induction and motional emf. Some guidance has been provided regarding the application of the impulse-momentum theorem and the setup of equations, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem asks to ignore self-induction, leading to discussions about the implications of this assumption on the circuit's behavior. There is also mention of the initial conditions and the transition to steady state, which adds complexity to the analysis.

Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


problem.jpg

choice.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As soon as switch S is closed , a current would flow in the circuit and the capacitor would act like a conducting wire . Force F =ilB towards right will act on the slider . There will be an acceleration but the velocity of the slider will be 0 .

Is the question correct ?
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 813
  • choice.jpg
    choice.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 760
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:
There will be an acceleration but the velocity of the slider will be 0 .
That would be true if self induction were not ignored.

Hint: Apply impulse-momentum theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
cnh1995 said:
That would be true if self induction were not ignored.

Hint: Apply impulse-momentum theorem.

Why would there be an impulsive force on the slider ? Since self induction is ignored there would be an immediate current flowing through the slider resulting in a force in right direction . This force will be there till current flows . It is not an impulsive force . No ?
 
Jahnavi said:
Since self induction is ignored there would be an immediate current flowing through the slider resulting in a force in right direction . This force will be there till current flows . It is not an impulsive force . No ?
It is an impulsive force. The current flows for a very short time ( ideally zero, practically very small) since there is no resistance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
And this large current i for a very brief duration ∆t charges the capacitor to a value Q =i∆t ?

When the question asks to ignore self inductance , it asks to ignore motional emf of magnitude Blv generated in the slider ?
 
Jahnavi said:
And this large current i for a very brief duration ∆t charges the capacitor to a value Q =i∆t ?
Right.
Jahnavi said:
When the question asks to ignore self inductance , it asks to ignore motional emf of magnitude Blv generated in the slider ?
No, it asks to ignore the self inductance of the loop.
 
cnh1995 said:
No, it asks to ignore the self inductance of the loop.

Aren't we neglecting motional emf developed across the ends of the slider ?

What would happen if self inductance of the loop is not ignored ?
 
Jahnavi said:
Aren't we neglecting motional emf developed across the ends of the
For the initial brief time Δt, we are ignoring the motional emf ,as Δt→0.

Jahnavi said:
What would happen if self inductance of the loop is not ignored ?
It will be a second-order circuit and the initial current will be zero. It gets mathematically complicated.
 
cnh1995 said:
No, it asks to ignore the self inductance of the loop.

By self induction , you mean dΦ/dt i.e rate of change of flux ?
 
  • #10
Jahnavi said:
By self induction , you mean dΦ/dt i.e rate of change of flux ?
Well, when the slider "starts" moving, we can't ignore the rate of change of flux i.e. the motional emf which is the result of self induction. And I think when they asked to ignore self induction, they meant ignore motional emf for that initial brief time.

What I had in mind was the self inductance (or stray inductance) of the loop when the slider is at rest, which is purely geometrical.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #11
Then you agree with later part of post#5 .No ?

I have another question quite similar to this one .

problem1.jpg
Writing KVL at any time t ,

E - iR -Bvl - Q/C =0 .

Is this the correct equation ? And more importantly is this the way to solve this problem ?
 

Attachments

  • problem1.jpg
    problem1.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 663
  • #12
Jahnavi said:
Then you agree with later part of post#5 .No ?
Yes. The interval Δt is so small that we can assume the velocity transition from 0 to vinitial is instantaneous.
Jahnavi said:
I have another question quite similar to this one .
Ok, but did you get the answer to the first one?
 
  • #13
Option B .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
  • #14
Jahnavi said:
Then you agree with later part of post#5 .No ?

I have another question quite similar to this one .

View attachment 214168Writing KVL at any time t ,

E - iR -Bvl - Q/C =0 .

Is this the correct equation ? And more importantly is this the way to solve this problem ?
You can convert it into a DE and solve for the general time domain solution, but in this case, it is not necessary.

The problem asks for the charge after a long time, which means the circuit will have reached steady state by then. What is the steady state scenario here? What can you say about the energy balance in steady state?
 
  • #15
cnh1995 said:
What is the steady state scenario here? What can you say about the energy balance in steady state?

There will be no current in the circuit . Slider will move with a constant speed v towards right . A constant motional emf Bvl will develop across the slider .KVL around the loop would be E - Bvl - Q/C = 0 . Right ?

But v is not known .

Regarding the energy balance part , QE - ∫i2Rdt =(1/2)mv2 + Q2/(2C) ?

But how do we calculate the second term i.e amount of electrical energy dissipated in the resistor ?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Edit: Erroneous post deleted.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
It will be better if I make a new thread for the second problem .

Thanks a lot for your help .
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Your reasoning for the steady state is correct.
cnh1995 said:
And when the two energy storing elements are different, energy associated with both of them is same.
Hmm, I take this statement back. That's not true. o:) It is true only when there's no dissipation. Sorry for that!
Actually, you don't need energy at all.
You can solve it in a much simpler way.

First, set up the force balance equation, in terms of velocity and charge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #19
Yeah . It is much simpler than I thought :)

Thanks again .
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K