Velocity of satellite at specific altitude

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the velocity and orbital period of a satellite at an altitude of 10,000 miles above Earth's surface. The correct orbital speed is approximately 9,400 miles per hour (or 4,202 m/s), derived using Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. Participants clarify that gravitational acceleration decreases with altitude, necessitating the use of a modified value for g at higher altitudes. The time taken for one complete orbit is approximately 9 hours, contrasting with an incorrect answer of 6 hours from an external source.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation
  • Understanding of gravitational acceleration variations with altitude
  • Basic unit conversion between miles and meters
  • Knowledge of circular motion and orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of orbital speed using Newton's Law of Gravitation
  • Learn about the effects of altitude on gravitational acceleration
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for physics calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between orbital radius and period using Kepler's laws
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in satellite dynamics and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

Biosyn
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How fast must a satellite 10,000 miles above Earth's surface travel, and how long does it take to complete one orbit of Earth?

Homework Equations



v^2 = g*r


The Attempt at a Solution



10,000 miles + radius of Earth = 14,000mi =

v^2 = (9.8)(2.253*10^7m)

v = 14859.13 m/s

The answer says 9400 miles per hour which is about 4202m/s.
Is there something I'm doing wrong or overlooking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is gravitational acceleration constant?
 
jhae2.718 said:
Is gravitational acceleration constant?

\frac{g_1}{g_2} = (\frac{r_2}{r_1})^2

\frac{22}{g_2} = (\frac{14000mi}{4000mi})^2

g_2 = 1.796mi/h/s

v^2 = (1.796)(14000)

v = 158.56 mi/h ?
 
Check your units. Also, what units are your value for ##g_1##? Recall ##g_0 \approx 32.17\text{ ft/s}^2##.
 
jhae2.718 said:
Check your units. Also, what units are your value for ##g_1##? Recall ##g_0 \approx 32.17\text{ ft/s}^2##.

g_2 = 1.7959 mph

(1.795mph)*(14000mi) = v^2

v = 158.56 mi/√hEdit: For g_1 I used 22mph because the other units are in miles.
 
Biosyn said:
g_2 = 1.7959 mph

(1.795mph)*(14000mi) = v^2

v = 158.56 mi/√h


Edit: For g_1 I used 22mph because the other units are in miles.

Sorry to say it, but this isn't making any sense. The quantity g is supposed to be an acceleration, but you have units of speed instead.

My approach to solving this problem would be to look at Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. I would also ask myself: considering that the object is moving in a circle at a constant speed, what kind of force must be present?
 
cepheid said:
Sorry to say it, but this isn't making any sense. The quantity g is supposed to be an acceleration, but you have units of speed instead.

My approach to solving this problem would be to look at Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation. I would also ask myself: considering that the object is moving in a circle at a constant speed, what kind of force must be present?

Okay sorry, I meant 22 mi/h/s...

and g_2 = 1.7959 mi/h/s at 10,000 miles above Earth's surface.
 
Check what you're doing with ##g_2##...the unit you should have is mi/(h*s)...so, what conversion do you need to do to your result?

You should maintain units throughout your calculations to avoid these types of errors.

Also, you should carry more precision for ##g_1## and ##R_\oplus##.
 
Okay, I'm getting confused. In the beginning I converted everything to meters.

altitude = 1.609*10^7m + 6.3675*10^6m
radius of Earth = 6.3675*10^6m
gravitational acceleration = 9.8m/s^2
v = ?

v^2 = g*r
v = sqrt(g*r)

v = sqrt( 9.8 * (1.609*10^7m + 6.3675*10^6m))
v = 14835.2m/s

But this doesn't equal 9400 mph.

I was using this website for help: http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1150/05UCMGrav/Sat.html
 
  • #10
Biosyn said:
Okay, I'm getting confused. In the beginning I converted everything to meters.

altitude = 1.609*10^7m + 6.3675*10^6m
radius of Earth = 6.3675*10^6m
gravitational acceleration = 9.8m/s^2
v = ?

v^2 = g*r
v = sqrt(g*r)

v = sqrt( 9.8 * (1.609*10^7m + 6.3675*10^6m))
v = 14835.2m/s

But this doesn't equal 9400 mph.

I was using this website for help: http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/1150/05UCMGrav/Sat.html

Suddenly we're back to square one. It has already been explained that you're using the wrong value for g, the one that applies at the Earth's surface, not 10,000 miles up. EDIT: This is why I like my approach of deriving the equation for the speed from Newton's Law of Gravitation. It's conceptually clearer, because stuff isn't hidden in "g."
 
  • #11
Biosyn said:
gravitational acceleration = 9.8m/s^2

##g \not = 9.8\text{ m/s}^2## that far from Earth. Recall that ##F_g \propto \frac{1}{r^2}##.

Use Newton's gravitational law to find ##g## at the altitude specified in the problem.

(Generally, SI units are almost exclusively used in the space world.)
 
  • #12
jhae2.718 said:
##g \not = 9.8\text{ m/s}^2## that far from Earth. Recall that ##F_g \propto \frac{1}{r^2}##.

Use Newton's gravitational law to find ##g## at the altitude specified in the problem.

(Generally, SI units are almost exclusively used in the space world.)

Okay, g_2 = (6.6742*10^(-11))*((5.9736*10^24)/(16371011.61))

g_2 = 1.4875 m*s^-2
 
  • #13
Biosyn said:
Okay, g_2 = (6.6742*10^(-11))*((5.9736*10^24)/(16371011.61))

g_2 = 1.4875 m*s^-2

You're using the wrong radius. ##R = R_\oplus + r##, where ##R## is the total radius, ##R_\oplus## is the radius of Earth, and ##r## is the geometric altitude of the satellite.

Your value is off by an order of magnitude.

My advice would be to solve the problem in terms of symbolic variables until you have an expression for ##v## in terms of the known variables, and only then substitute numerical values.
 
  • #14
jhae2.718 said:
You're using the wrong radius. ##R = R_\oplus + r##, where ##R## is the total radius, ##R_\oplus## is the radius of Earth, and ##r## is the geometric altitude of the satellite.

Okay.

10,000 miles = 1.609*10^7 meters

R = (6.37101*10^6 + 1.609*10^7)
R= (22461010)
R^2 = 5.044*10^14m

g_2 = (6.6742*10^-11)*(5.044*10^14)
g_2 = 0.790424

v^2 = 0.790424 * 22461010
v = 4213.51 m/s

Edit: Which is approximately 9400 mph. Thanks for helping me! :)
 
  • #15
No problem!
 
  • #16
jhae2.718 said:
No problem!

Actually there's one more question I have which is finding the time it takes the satellite to orbit the Earth once.

Can you please verify this?

T = 2*pi*sqrt((r^3)/(G*m))

T = 2*pi* Sqrt(\frac{22461010^3}{G*m_E})T = 33627.87 seconds
T = 9 hours 20 minutes
 
  • #17
Biosyn said:
Actually there's one more question I have which is finding the time it takes the satellite to orbit the Earth once.

Can you please verify this?

T = 2*pi*sqrt((r^3)/(G*m))

T = 2*pi* Sqrt(\frac{22461010^3}{G*m_E})


T = 33627.87 seconds
T = 9 hours 20 minutes

This is fine, but there's an easier way to calculate it, which is to say speed = distance/time, where the distance is the circumference of the orbit.

Since you *already* calculated the speed, you can just plug in into this equation. If you use the equation that has r , G, and M_E in it, then you are implicitly calculating the speed *again*, which is a waste of time, since you already know it.
 
  • #18
cepheid said:
This is fine, but there's an easier way to calculate it, which is to say speed = distance/time, where the distance is the circumference of the orbit.

Since you *already* calculated the speed, you can just plug in into this equation. If you use the equation that has r , G, and M_E in it, then you are implicitly calculating the speed *again*, which is a waste of time, since you already know it.

Oh, right.
Well, the answer says it takes the satellite 6 hours to complete one orbit around Earth which is about 3 hours shorter than what I came up with (9 hours). Am I wrong?
 
  • #19
Biosyn said:
Oh, right.
Well, the answer says it takes the satellite 6 hours to complete one orbit around Earth which is about 3 hours shorter than what I came up with (9 hours). Am I wrong?

No, you just used the wrong radius for the orbit. The orbit is a circle. The radius of a circle is the distance between the *centre* of that circle and each point on the circle. In this case, what is the radius of the circle? (Hint: it is not 10,000 miles).
 
  • #20
cepheid said:
No, you just used the wrong radius for the orbit. The orbit is a circle. The radius of a circle is the distance between the *centre* of that circle and each point on the circle. In this case, what is the radius of the circle? (Hint: it is not 10,000 miles).

It's the radius of Earth + the distance of the satellite from the surface of Earth. This is what I used though...

Edit: I used 22461010 meters.

6.3675*10^6 + 1.609*10^7 = 22457500 meters

^Using this radius, I still get around 9 hours.
 
  • #21
Biosyn said:
It's the radius of Earth + the distance of the satellite from the surface of Earth. This is what I used though...

Edit: I used 22461010 meters.

6.3675*10^6 + 1.609*10^7 = 22457500 meters

^Using this radius, I still get around 9 hours.

Sorry, I misread what you said before. I thought that *you* got 6 hours and the answer key said 9.

You got ~9 hrs using two independent methods. So that's consistent. And (2*pi*14,000 mi)/(9400 mph) is definitely about nine and a third hours. (without a calculator, 2pi is ~6, and 6*14 is 84, and 84/9 is just above 9).

If the answer key says six, then *they* made the mistake with the orbit radius that I referred to before.
 
  • #22
cepheid said:
Sorry, I misread what you said before. I thought that *you* got 6 hours and the answer key said 9.

You got ~9 hrs using two independent methods. So that's consistent. And (14,000 mi)/(9400 mph) is definitely about nine and a third hours. If the answer key says six, then *they* made the mistake with the orbit radius that I referred to before.

Oh, okay. Thank you for the help! :)
 
  • #23
Approx. 9 hours is correct. If you work backwards, the provided answer uses ##R = R_\oplus + 5000\text{ mi}## instead of ##R = R_\oplus + 10000\text{ mi}##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K