Verify that the function U is a solution for Laplace Equation.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function U = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-1/2) is analyzed to determine if it satisfies the three-dimensional Laplace equation, Uxx + Uyy + Uzz = 0. The partial derivatives Uxx, Uyy, and Uzz were calculated, revealing that the sum does not initially appear to equal zero. However, upon rewriting the expressions as fractions and combining them, it is confirmed that the sum does indeed equal zero, validating that U is a solution to the Laplace equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the Laplace equation and its properties
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation of fractions
  • Experience with functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laplace equation in three dimensions
  • Learn techniques for simplifying complex algebraic expressions
  • Explore the implications of solutions to the Laplace equation in physics
  • Investigate other functions that satisfy the Laplace equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with differential equations and seeking to understand solutions to the Laplace equation.

DavidAp
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Verify that the function U = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-1/2) is a solution of the three-dimensional Laplace equation Uxx + Uyy + Uzz = 0.

First I solved for the partial derivative Uxx,
Ux
= 2x(-1/2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)
= -x(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)

Uxx
= -(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) + -x(2x)(-3/2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2)
= 3(x^2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)

From there I saw that for finding the partial derivative Uyy & Uzz I would just have the change the variable being squared in the beginning of the function. So,

Uxx =3(x^2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)
Uyy =3(y^2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)
Uzz =3(z^2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)

Because, through my observation, everything should just stay the same. However, when added together I get,

Uxx + Uyy + Uzz
= 3(3x^2 + 3y^2 + 3z^2)[(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2)]

As you can see this ridiculously long function is not zero which leads to my question. Why didn't everything cancel itself out? Wasn't that suppose to happen, everything cancels itself out so I can say that Laplace's Rule works and it all equals to zero? I'm confused.

Again, thank you so much for reviewing my question and not being deterred at the sheer sight of my derivation of the partial derivatives and algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Advice: write U_xx = 3(x^2)(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-5/2) - (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(-3/2) as a single fraction, and then proceed.

Also I'm not sure how you got what you got when you added the 3 terms together.
 
I don't see anything wrong with what you did - the only problem is that you didn't take it far enough.

Uxx = -(x2 + y2 + z2)-3/2 + 3x2(x2 + y2 + z2)-5/2

I rewrote all three expressions using positive exponents (getting fractions), and then combined the fractions.

For example,
U_{xx} = \frac{-(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) + 3z^2}{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{5/2}}

If you add all three of the indicated second partials, you do in fact get zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K