MHB Verifying Answers to True/False Questions about Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying answers to true/false questions about matrices. For the first question regarding matrices A and B, the consensus is that the answers provided are correct, particularly noting that A and B do not need to be of the same order. The second question about a 3x3 non-invertible matrix reveals a potential error in the answer to part d, where it is clarified that if rank(A)=1, the matrix after row operations will have at least one zero row, not necessarily the original matrix A. Overall, the majority of the answers are confirmed as accurate, with a minor correction suggested. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding matrix properties in relation to their ranks and dimensions.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have been trying to solve a couple of true / false questions, and I am not sure my answers are correct, I would appreciate it if you could verify it.

The first question is:

A and B are matrices such that it is possible to calculate:

\[C=AB+B^{t}A^{t}\]

a. A and B are of the same order
b. C is symmetric
c. BA can be calculated
d. A and B are squared matrices
e. \[ABA^{t}\] can be calculated

My answers are: a - false, b - true , c - true, d - false e - false

The second question is:

A is a 3x3 not invertible matrix:

a. The system Ax=b has a unique solution for every vector b
b. The system Ax=b has infinite number of solutions for every vector b
c. The matrix kA is not invertible for every real number k.
d. If rank(A)=1, then A has at least one row of 0's.
e. There exist a vector b such that Ax=b has infinite number of solutions.

My answers are: a - false, b - false, c - true, d - true, e - true

Is there something wrong with my solutions ?

Thanks a million !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say $A$ is an $(m \times n)$ matrix and $B$ is $(n \times p)$. Then $AB$ is an $(m \times p)$ matrix and and $B^T A^T$ is $(p \times m)$. This implies that $p=m$ for it to be possible to add the two products together to make $C$ but that doesn't mean that $A$ and $B$ are necessarily of the same order. It seems to me that the two matrices could be square but don't have to be.

Assuming my reasoning is correct then your answers for the first one look good. They are all consistent too, which is good.
 
Yankel said:
Hello

I have been trying to solve a couple of true / false questions, and I am not sure my answers are correct, I would appreciate it if you could verify it.

The first question is:

A and B are matrices such that it is possible to calculate:

\[C=AB+B^{t}A^{t}\]

a. A and B are of the same order
b. C is symmetric
c. BA can be calculated
d. A and B are squared matrices
e. \[ABA^{t}\] can be calculated

My answers are: a - false, b - true , c - true, d - false e - false

The second question is:

A is a 3x3 not invertible matrix:

a. The system Ax=b has a unique solution for every vector b
b. The system Ax=b has infinite number of solutions for every vector b
c. The matrix kA is not invertible for every real number k.
d. If rank(A)=1, then A has at least one row of 0's.
e. There exist a vector b such that Ax=b has infinite number of solutions.

My answers are: a - false, b - false, c - true, d - true, e - true

Is there something wrong with my solutions ?

Thanks a million !
I would take a second look at 2d. Everything else looks good.
 
you are right, my mistake !

If rank(A)=1, the matrix after the elementary row operations has at least one 0 row, not the original A.

Thanks !
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
974
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K