Vertical asymptote with an epsilon-delta proof?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence of a vertical asymptote for the function f(x) = 1/x as x approaches zero using epsilon-delta definitions. Participants confirm that the left-sided limit as x approaches zero from the negative side is -∞, validated by selecting δ = 1/ε. The proof structure is emphasized, highlighting the importance of clarity in stating the theorem being proved. The conversation references the textbook "Calculus," 7th edition, by Robert A. Adams and Christopher Essex, and a Khan Academy video for further clarification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vertical asymptotes in calculus
  • Familiarity with epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic knowledge of real number ordering
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Learn about vertical asymptotes and their implications in calculus
  • Review the concept of limits approaching infinity
  • Explore additional resources on proof structuring in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limits and asymptotic behavior in functions.

mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
658
Reaction score
361
TL;DR
I've got a very recurred rational function for which I would like to find out the proof of the vertical asymptote.
Hi, PF

The aim is to prove how the approach from the left and right sides of the ##x##x axis eventually renders a vertical asymptote for the function ##\frac{1}{x}##. I've been searching in the textbook "Calculus", 7th edition, by Robert A. Adams and Christopher Essex, but I haven't found nothing but uncertain clues. Or naive proofs ( i.e., YouTube, mentioning the fact that the more we become near to zero at the abscissa, the less turns the ordinate). Any suggestion would be fine. Apologizes for not attempt provided.

Vertcal asymptote.jpg
Greetings!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't this follow directly from the ordering of the real numbers? From that you have that

(1) x^{-1} is strictly decreasing for x > 0 (0 < x < y < 1 \Leftrightarrow 1 < 1/y < 1/x).
(2) \{x^{-1} : x > 0 \} has no upper bound (consider the sequence x_n = n^{-1} for integer n > 0.)
(3) Multiplication by -1 reverses order.

EDIT: There is a vertical asymptote at zero for essentially the same reasons that x^{-1} \to 0 as x \to \infty; it is easy to see that the curve (x,x^{-1}) is symmetric about the line (x,x).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
 
mcastillo356 said:
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
It's the outline of a proof, but not a proof. Also, you begin by stating what it is you want to prove. It's not clear whether this is an assumption (which would be wrong) or a statement of what you are trying to prove.

You must be able to structure an elementary proof correctly before you can tackle more complicated proofs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K