Vertical trajectory with air resistance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a particle projected vertically upwards with an initial velocity \( U_0 \) in a gravitational field, accounting for air resistance proportional to the square of the velocity. The key equation derived is \( \frac{dv}{dt} = \gamma v^2 - g \), where \( \gamma = \frac{g}{V_t^2} \) and \( V_t \) represents the terminal velocity. The participant seeks clarification on the correct interpretation of the modulus during the integration process, ultimately aiming to show that the speed of the particle upon returning to its starting point is \( \frac{U_0 V_t}{U_0^2 + V_t^2} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations
  • Knowledge of terminal velocity concepts
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equation of motion for a particle under gravity and air resistance
  • Learn about solving first-order differential equations
  • Investigate the concept of terminal velocity and its implications in physics
  • Explore the use of modulus in mathematical expressions and its impact on solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics and dynamics, as well as anyone involved in solving differential equations related to motion under gravity and air resistance.

GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a particle P of mass m is projected vertically upwards with velocity [tex]U_0\mathbf{k}[/tex] in a uniform gravitational field [tex]-g\mathbf{k}[/tex] with air resistance proportional to the square of the velocity.

This is a five part question for which I have found the solutions but there is one method I tried for the last part which lead me to trouble and would like some help clearing it up:

v) Show that the speed of the particle as i returns to its starting point is:
[tex]\frac{U_0^2V_t^2}{\sqrt{U_0^2+V_t^2}}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The equation required to solve (v) is [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}\mathbf{k} = \gamma v^2\mathbf{k} - g\mathbf{k}[/tex] where [tex]\gamma > 0[/tex] and is a constant of proportionality. (it is a lumped constant made up of [tex]\mu/m[/tex] where [tex]\mu[/tex] is also a constant of proportionality > 0.
[tex]V_t =[/tex] terminal velocity
The value of [tex]\gamma[/tex] (not given), I found to be [tex]\frac{g}{V_t^2}[/tex] since the forces acting on P cancel.

The maximum height reached by P is
[tex]\frac{V_t^2}{2g}log(\frac{U_0^2+V_t^2}{V_t^2})[/tex] This found by solving the ODE where the sign of [tex]\gamma[/tex] is negative

The Attempt at a Solution


There is one step that is giving me trouble but here goes:
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}\mathbf{k} = v\frac{dv}{ds}[/tex] (where s(t) is the position of P) such that
[tex]v\frac{dv}{ds}\mathbf{k} = \gamma v^2\mathbf{k} - g\mathbf{k}[/tex]
[tex]v\frac{dv}{ds}\mathbf{k} = \frac{g}{V_t^2}( v^2 - V_t^2)\mathbf{k}[/tex] subbing in for [tex]\gamma[/tex]
[tex]\frac{V_t^2}{g}(\frac{v}{v^2 - V_t^2})\frac{dv}{ds}\mathbf{k} = \mathbf{k}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{V_t^2}{2g}log|v^2 - V_t^2|\mathbf{k} = (s + C)\mathbf{k}[/tex]

now at t = 0 (ie: just as P has reached a maximum) s = [tex]\frac{V_t^2}{2g}log(\frac{U_0^2+V_t^2}{V_t^2})[/tex] with v = 0 and so subbing in:
[tex]C\mathbf{k} = \frac{V_t^2}{2g}(log|- V_t^2| - log(\frac{U_0^2+V_t^2}{V_t^2}))\mathbf{k}[/tex] such that:

[tex]\frac{V_t^2}{2g}log|v^2 - V_t^2|\mathbf{k} = (s + \frac{V_t^2}{2g}(log\frac{|- V_t^2|V_t^2}{U_0^2+V_t^2}))\mathbf{k}[/tex]

I now want to solve for v when s = 0
[tex]|v^2 - V_t^2|\mathbf{k} = \frac{|- V_t^2|V_t^2}{U_0^2+V_t^2}\mathbf{k}[/tex] removed the common factor and exponentiated both sides...Now it's the negative terms in the modulus signs that are causing me bother. If I square and then take the roots to get rid of them I am just as entitled to take the positive square root as I am the negative, only the former leads to:
[tex]|v| = \frac{U_0^2V_t^2 + 2V_t^4}{\sqrt{U_0^2+V_t^2}}[/tex] which is what I don't want! I(and if I was ignorant as to what my solution should be might be tempted to accept it along with the other...causing much head scratching)

Am I justified in just saying that I'll take the negative root or is this a poor step?For what its worth I reached the correct solution by pulling a minus sign out of the LHS before integrating but no matter how I do it, shouldn't I still reach a solution that is equally true regardless of my method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
have run out of editting time but the answer to find should have been
[tex]\frac{U_0V_t}{U_0^2+V_t^2}[/tex] and the problematic answer I get at the end should read as [tex]\sqrt{\frac{U_0^2V_t^2 + 2V_t^4}{U_0^2+V_t^2}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K