Very Quick momentum equation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter crimsonn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a perfectly elastic collision problem involving two masses: a 0.440 kg ball moving at 3.70 m/s and a 0.220 kg ball at rest. The conservation of momentum and kinetic energy equations are utilized to determine the final velocities of both balls after the collision. The key equations are m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2' for momentum and ½ m1 v1² + ½ m2 v2² = ½ m1 v1'² + ½ m2 v2'² for kinetic energy. The discussion highlights the use of relative velocity conservation as a simpler method for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy in elastic collisions
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations
  • Basic concepts of relative velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of conservation of momentum in elastic collisions
  • Learn how to derive and solve quadratic equations
  • Explore the concept of relative velocity in collision problems
  • Investigate the use of determinants in solving linear equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to elastic collisions.

crimsonn
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
A ball of mass 0.440 kg moving east with a speed of 3.70 m/s collides head-on with a 0.220-kg mass at rest. If the collision is perfectly elastic, what is the speed and direction of each ball after the collision?

momentum conservation:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1¢ + m2v2¢;
(0.440 kg)(3.70 m/s) + (0.220 kg)(0) = (0.440 kg)v1¢ + (0.220 kg)v2¢.
1.628 kg m/s = (0.440 kg)v1¢ + (0.220 kg)v2¢

elastic, kinetic energy is constant:
½ m1 v21 + ½m2 v22 = ½ m1v1’2 + ½ m2v2’2,
½ (0.440 kg)(3.70 m/s)2 + 0 = ½ (0.440 kg)v1’2 + ½ (0.220 kg)v2’2
6.02 kg m2/s2 = (0.440 kg)v1’2 + (0.220 kg)v2’2


Whats the quickest way to solve with 2 variables? This one gets a little messy because of the velocity squares.

My teacher was talking about using a derterminant. Could I use one for this question? If not, can you please given an example of a problem in which I can use one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way is to use the "conservation" of the relative velocity instead of the cons of energy. If follows from conservation of energy in the general form, combined with cons of momentum.
v1-v2 = -(v1'-v2') (all vectors). Relative velocity is reversed but it has the same magnitude.

If you did not see this before, you'll have to solve the quadratic equation.
Determinants are used in general for solving linear equations.
 
Last edited:
Solve this first in the center-of-mass frame of reference, and then work back to the original frame of reference.
 
nasu said:
The easiest way is to use the "conservation" of the relative velocity instead of the cons of energy. If follows from conservation of energy in the general form, combined with cons of momentum.
v1-v2 = -(v1'-v2') (all vectors). Relative velocity is reversed but it has the same magnitude.

If you did not see this before, you'll have to solve the quadratic equation.
Determinants are used in general for solving linear equations.



wow. thank you. that was actually a very simple problem. I made it more complicated than it was.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K