• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Very Quick momentum equation question

  • Thread starter crimsonn
  • Start date
  • #1
30
0
A ball of mass 0.440 kg moving east with a speed of 3.70 m/s collides head-on with a 0.220-kg mass at rest. If the collision is perfectly elastic, what is the speed and direction of each ball after the collision?

momentum conservation:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1¢ + m2v2¢;
(0.440 kg)(3.70 m/s) + (0.220 kg)(0) = (0.440 kg)v1¢ + (0.220 kg)v2¢.
1.628 kg m/s = (0.440 kg)v1¢ + (0.220 kg)v2¢

elastic, kinetic energy is constant:
½ m1 v21 + ½m2 v22 = ½ m1v1’2 + ½ m2v2’2,
½ (0.440 kg)(3.70 m/s)2 + 0 = ½ (0.440 kg)v1’2 + ½ (0.220 kg)v2’2
6.02 kg m2/s2 = (0.440 kg)v1’2 + (0.220 kg)v2’2


Whats the quickest way to solve with 2 variables? This one gets a little messy because of the velocity squares.

My teacher was talking about using a derterminant. Could I use one for this question? If not, can you please given an example of a problem in which I can use one?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
3,732
414
The easiest way is to use the "conservation" of the relative velocity instead of the cons of energy. If follows from conservation of energy in the general form, combined with cons of momentum.
v1-v2 = -(v1'-v2') (all vectors). Relative velocity is reversed but it has the same magnitude.

If you did not see this before, you'll have to solve the quadratic equation.
Determinants are used in general for solving linear equations.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
367
0
Solve this first in the center-of-mass frame of reference, and then work back to the original frame of reference.
 
  • #4
30
0
The easiest way is to use the "conservation" of the relative velocity instead of the cons of energy. If follows from conservation of energy in the general form, combined with cons of momentum.
v1-v2 = -(v1'-v2') (all vectors). Relative velocity is reversed but it has the same magnitude.

If you did not see this before, you'll have to solve the quadratic equation.
Determinants are used in general for solving linear equations.


wow. thank you. that was actually a very simple problem. I made it more complicated than it was.
 

Related Threads for: Very Quick momentum equation question

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
735
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
931
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top