- #1
AnkurGarg
- 18
- 0
Are temporary embryonic structures like gill clefts included under "Vestigeal organs"??
From where did you get that ,Sir?I mean something I can show my teacher as a proof??Simon Bridge said:No.
Vestigial organs are those which are present in the body but is no longer in use.They are those organs which are lost in the process of evolution due to the environment and conditions that no longer asks for their use.AnkurGarg said:From where did you get that ,Sir?I mean something I can show my teacher as a proof??
Docscientist said:the tamed wild animals
Simon Bridge said:Hence, "tamed wild animal" is a tautology, not an oxymoron.
epenguin said:"Tame wild animals" would be an oxymoron, but "tamed wild animals" is not. I will explain if anyone finds it necessary.
epenguin said:Whereas 'tamed' is not an adjective but a past participle
epenguin said:an animal can be both when not at the same time
Quite correct - Doc has made an error of fact.If you look at the passage in it's broader context, you'd have to agree that Homo erectus was not roaming the jungle two million years ago looking to bite tamed wild animals. Animals did not become domesticated until the Neolithic era, roughly 12,000 years ago, whereas Homo erectus went extinct about 100,000 years ago or even earlier. So there was no biting of tamed wild animals going on anywheres in the jungle anyways back then
Simon Bridge said:@DiracPool curious wee rant... just thinking about it a bit more:
Before an animal can be tamed, it must first be wild. Hence, "tamed wild animal" is a tautology, not an oxymoron.
Vestigial organs are body parts or structures that have lost their original function through the process of evolution. They are remnants of organs or structures that were once functional in ancestral species, but are no longer needed in modern organisms.
The purpose of vestigial organs is a topic of debate among scientists. Some believe that they serve no purpose at all, while others suggest that they may have had a function in the past and have since become obsolete. Some also argue that vestigial organs may still have some minor function or provide evolutionary advantages.
Vestigial organs differ from other organs in that they have lost their original function. Other organs in the body have a specific purpose and are crucial for survival, while vestigial organs are no longer necessary for an organism's survival.
Yes, vestigial organs can be found in many different types of organisms, including humans. They are more common in species that have undergone significant evolutionary changes over time.
Yes, vestigial organs are considered evidence for evolution as they demonstrate the concept of natural selection and the gradual changes that occur in species over time. They also provide insight into the evolutionary history of a species and can help support the theory of common ancestry.