Physics Viability of publishing as an independent researcher

Click For Summary
Publishing as an independent researcher raises ethical concerns regarding the disclosure of institutional affiliations, even when the researcher feels no direct connection to their university. Ethical standards in scientific publishing require authors to disclose their affiliations to maintain transparency and allow readers to assess potential conflicts of interest. The discussion emphasizes that failing to acknowledge one's institutional affiliation can be considered scientifically unethical, regardless of the nature of the research. Participants argue that ethical guidelines, such as those from the ICMJE, apply universally across fields, including theoretical physics. Ultimately, adherence to these standards is crucial for maintaining public confidence in scientific integrity.
  • #31
Dale said:
Yes, here the goal is to avoid conflicts of interest
and also apparent conflicts of interest. Could I fairly avaluate a paper written by a family member? Sure. But isn't it better to recuse myself?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
While I still don't see any conflict of interest, it seems that not disclosing the university could create lots of problems and it is, hence, and unwise course of action. So better not doing it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
  • #33
andresB said:
While I still don't see any conflict of interest, it seems that not disclosing the university could create lots of problems and it is, hence, and unwise course of action. So better not doing it.
As @Vanadium 50 hinted at above, the most obvious reason editors will want to know your affiliation to avoid conflicts of interest is when assigning peer reviewers. This potential conflict will exist regardless of the content or findings of the paper, as it is inherent in the publication process itself. For that reason, editors will generally not assign reviewers to a manuscript when the authors are from the same institution.

The reason I’m on the fence about labeling this a conflict of interest specifically is that, at least for most of the journals I publish in, there’s a specific required conflict of interest statement that is separate from the place where the institutional affiliation is listed, and institutional affiliation (at least in academia/government—obviously if you work for a company where a conflict is clear, you’d list it) is rarely—to my knowledge—explicitly listed in this statement. I guess if I were going to leave the institutional affiliation section blank, I’d probably have to include my affiliation in the conflict of interest statement, but it’s honestly never occurred to me not to list affiliation if you are actually affiliated with an institution.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
  • #34
andresB said:
I still don't see any conflict of interest,
And that is exactly the reason that the ethical standards requiring such disclosure are not discretionary.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #35
TeethWhitener said:
The reason I’m on the fence about labeling this a conflict of interest specifically is that, at least for most of the journals I publish in, there’s a specific required conflict of interest statement that is separate from the place where the institutional affiliation is listed, and institutional affiliation (at least in academia/government—obviously if you work for a company where a conflict is clear, you’d list it) is rarely—to my knowledge—explicitly listed in this statement.
The APS makes it clear that employment can create a conflict of interest and thus must be disclosed. How a journal chooses to implement that in their forms doesn’t change the ethical standard.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
8K