timmdeeg
Gold Member
- 1,534
- 340
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-712X/8/3/65
In short, if the dynamics of spiral galaxies are dependent on galactic morphology in the way predicted by GR-SI, and the morphology of galaxies are correlated with their number of satellite galaxies (and more generally, their environment), then we expect to see a correlation between the dynamics of galaxies and their external fields. This expected correlation is in direct contrast to the explanation given in [11] wherein external fields directly affect the dynamics of spiral galaxies via the suppression of the MOND effect.
According to Alexandre Deur GR-SI (GR Self-interaction) could replace the assumption of Dark Matter. Here it seems that GR-SI could replace MOND in a very certain context.
The article is much beyond my understanding. Do the calculations in this article strengthen GR-SI?
In short, if the dynamics of spiral galaxies are dependent on galactic morphology in the way predicted by GR-SI, and the morphology of galaxies are correlated with their number of satellite galaxies (and more generally, their environment), then we expect to see a correlation between the dynamics of galaxies and their external fields. This expected correlation is in direct contrast to the explanation given in [11] wherein external fields directly affect the dynamics of spiral galaxies via the suppression of the MOND effect.
According to Alexandre Deur GR-SI (GR Self-interaction) could replace the assumption of Dark Matter. Here it seems that GR-SI could replace MOND in a very certain context.
The article is much beyond my understanding. Do the calculations in this article strengthen GR-SI?
Last edited: