Vol(T)=0 proof about Vol(g(T))

  • Thread starter Thread starter calvino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on proving that if Vol(T)=0 and g is a differentiable function with det Dg ≠ 0, then Vol(g(T)) must also equal 0. The argument begins with the premise that T can be covered by a union of sub-cubes whose total volume can be made arbitrarily small. The continuity of g is crucial, as it allows for the transformation of these sub-cubes into corresponding volumes under g, maintaining the property of having a total volume less than any given epsilon. The discussion highlights the importance of differentiability and the determinant condition in ensuring the preservation of volume properties during transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measure theory, specifically the concept of volume in higher dimensions.
  • Familiarity with differentiable functions and their properties, particularly in relation to continuity.
  • Knowledge of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix and its implications in transformation of volumes.
  • Basic concepts of covering sets with sub-cubes in metric spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Jacobian determinant in multivariable calculus, specifically in volume transformations.
  • Explore measure theory concepts, focusing on sets of measure zero and their properties.
  • Investigate the continuity of functions and its relationship to uniform continuity in the context of differentiable functions.
  • Review theorems related to covering sets with cubes and their applications in real analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in advanced calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of volume transformations under differentiable mappings.

calvino
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Prove that if Vol(T)=0, and g is differentiable with det Dg not equal to 0, then Vol(g(T))=0. T is a cube.


Here's my idea, although it doesn't incorporate the fact that det Dg <> 0.

Since Vol(T)=0, then T is a subset of a the union of sub cubes T1, T2, ..., Tn. Furthermore the sum of all volumes of Ti, i=1,2,...,n, < epsilon. [at this point, I am not sure how to choose my epsilon, but I suppose I can't know 'til later.]

since g is differentiable, g is continuous [ Do i have enough to say g is uniformly continuous? b/c that may help]. So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.

Here is where I'm stuck. My next intuition is to take g of tiny intervals which make each Ti, and then show that the sum of all volumes g(Ti) < epsilon'-usingi the fact that g is continous. I'm just unsure how to go about doing so. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If T is a cube, how is Vol(T) = 0? Perhaps T is a cube in 4-dimensional space? I think you need to clarify the question.
So for S>0, there is an epsilon' >0, such that |x-y|< S implies |g(x)- g(y)|< epsilon'.
Where are you getting this from? This is false. If you're assuming that the continuity of g gives you this, then you're wrong. Let g be a real-valued function of one real variable, specifically, the exponential function. Then your claim above fails. Continuity says that for epsilon' > 0, there is an S > 0 such that |x - y| < S implies |g(x) - g(y)| < epsilon'.

For Vol(T) = 0 to be true, you must be able to cover T by some number of cubes (not necessarily finite) such that the total volume of all the cubes can be made arbitrarily small. If we're talking about the real line, for instance, then let's say T is some one-point set. We can cover it by a cube (open interval) of radius e/2 (for any e > 0 we want) centered at the element of T. Any set with a countable number of points can be covered by cubes in the following way:

Since the set is countable, order the elements t1, t2, ... (i.e. index the elements by the natural numbers). Around ti, place a cube Ci of volume e/2i. Then certainly, these cubes cover T and the sum of their volumes is:

[tex]\sum _{k=1} ^{\infty }\frac{e}{2^i} = e[/tex]

So for your problem, you are given the fact that for any e > 0, you can cover T by some number of cubes such that their total volume is < e. What can you say then about cubes that cover g? Also, what theorems do you know that involve det Dg <> 0?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K