Voltage as the cause of motion of charges?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the relationship between voltage and the motion of charges, specifically questioning whether voltage can be considered the primary cause of current. Participants clarify that while voltage represents potential energy differences, it is the electric field, derived from voltage gradients, that actually drives charge movement. They emphasize that energy conversion processes, such as those in hydroelectric generators and batteries, are fundamental to generating both voltage and current. The conversation concludes that voltage differences, rather than voltage alone, are the true driving force behind current flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of voltage and electric fields
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and its applications
  • Knowledge of energy conversion processes (e.g., hydroelectric generators, batteries)
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics and charge interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical relationship between electric fields and voltage gradients
  • Study the principles of energy conversion in hydroelectric systems
  • Learn about the diode equation and its implications for current flow
  • Investigate the breakdown of dielectrics and the conditions for electrical conduction
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental principles of electricity and charge movement.

  • #31
gralla55 said:
Yes, if it is the same path. But if you have the same potential difference between the endpoints of a wire with length L, and a wire with length 2L, shouldn't the strength of the eletric field be half inside the second wire? The integral says that the work the field does along the path is the same. If the path is twice as long, the field would have to be twice as weak to get the same work.
Yes. If you use half the force over twice the distance then you have the same amount of work. In the equation ##-\int E\cdot ds=\Delta V## if s increases then E must decrease (all other things the same) for ΔV to stay the same.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
gralla55 said:
A voltage "by itself" is not enough to determine the strength of an electric field between two points, you have to also know the distance between the two points in question.
There is no such thing as "the strength of an electric field between two points", as far as I know. There is the strength of the E field at a point, ##|E|##, and there is the E field along a path, ##\int E\cdot ds##. Each is related to the voltage appropriately.

Suppose that you have a very strong uniform E field and a path perpendicular to the E field. Despite being strong, the E field does not drive any current along the path because ##E \cdot ds=0##. It is only the E field along the path which drives current along the path.
 
Last edited:
  • #33
DaleSpam:

Strictly speaking, you are correct of course. However, if the magnitude of the electric field X at every point between point A and B were larger than the magnitude of the electric field Y on every point between point C and D, it's common to refer to field X as the "stronger electric field", even though it is unpresise as a mathematical description.

DrZoidberg:

Thanks a lot for the link! Great diagrams and drawings. One thing that's still not clear to me, is if the magnitude of an electric field inside a wire with DC current is taken to be constant everywhere in the wire?
 
  • #34
gralla55 said:
if the magnitude of the electric field X at every point between point A and B were larger than the magnitude of the electric field Y on every point between point C and D, it's common to refer to field X as the "stronger electric field", even though it is unpresise as a mathematical description.
Yes, but as I pointed out above, if this is what you mean by the term then the strength of the electric field does not drive current along a path.

In the end, your textbook is correct, the voltage does drive it. You can also say the E field drives it, because of how the E field and the voltage are related.
 
  • #35
Voltage does not "drive current".

Claude
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K