Volume Measurement (Dry Method)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and implementation of a pressure chamber for volume measurement using a dry method. Participants share their progress, suggestions for improvements, and technical considerations related to the construction and testing of the chamber.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares initial results of their project and invites suggestions for improvements.
  • Another participant suggests using a cylindrical chamber with an o-ring and vacuum grease to enhance the seal and reduce pressure leakage.
  • A participant mentions building a pressure chamber based on the suggestions received.
  • Technical advice is given regarding accuracy checks, including the use of machined cubes or cylinders for volume measurement and the importance of temperature control when filling with pressurized air.
  • Concerns are raised about the cost of hardware improvements and the need for additional sensors to monitor temperature within the chamber.
  • Discussion includes the method for passing sensor leads through the pressure chamber walls and the potential for leaks if not properly installed.
  • Clarification is provided about the current placement of sensors and their functionality in relation to the pressure chamber.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various suggestions and technical considerations, but there is no consensus on the best approach or design. Multiple competing views and methods are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific hardware components and their functionalities, but there are unresolved details regarding the effectiveness of the proposed solutions and the overall design of the pressure chamber.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in experimental physics, engineering design, and those working on pressure measurement systems may find this discussion relevant.

TechFan
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Hi:

I have been working in this Project for a while now and I would like to share the results with you. Still needs some improvements; but it appears to be working fine so far. Please let me know your suggestions and ideas.
Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
To help with the pressure leakage: use a cylindrical chamber for the testing, with an o-ring and a groove for the pneumatic seal - similar to those used in vacuum chambers. A small bit of vacuum grease on the o-ring will improve the seal by "evening out" any small irregularities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi:
Really thanks. I'm already building a Pressure chamber very similar to your description. Will post soon...
Thank you so much.
 
Hi TechFan,

Very clever. For the accuracy checks, I would test machined cubes or cylinders with volumes that can be precisely measured. When filling with pressurized air, realize the air temp can be quite different from RT, at least initially. I would add a temp sensor inside to tell you when the air is very close to RT, and then start the test. Or, run the air through some form of heat exchanger to get it to match the RT. As noted before, use say an acrylic tubular housing, with o-rings on the top cap. Keep the pressures way below what this stucture can handle. The bottom can be sealed tight with acylic glue. A fun counter test would be to pull a vacuum within the chamber and measure the flow of RT air INTO the unit. This assumes the test unit won't be affected by vacuum. Again, make sure the design of the housing can handle vacuum without imploding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi:
Thanks for your comments and suggestions. Right now I'm working on most of the things you have mentioned. The main goal so far was to test if the concept could work. The main problem is hardware improvements cost real money and not just my time on this. I already have the new Chamber (leak free) built with help from a machine shop and a some "greenbacks", working on another sensor to be placed inside the chamber as I want to monitor temp behavior right in there and also improving the GUI to perform leaks tests also. I'll post an update soon.
These are the sensors I'm using. I'll place another LM35DZ inside the chamber (trying)
-For Pressure Honeywell SSCDRNN250MGAA5 datasheet (http://sensing.honeywell.com/index.php/ci_id/44282/la_id/1/document/1/re_id/0 )
-For temp LM35DZ (http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm35.pdf)
Thank you so much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How are the sensor leads passed through the pressure chamber walls?

These work well for vacuum systems, though they leak if you crack the ceramic!
http://www.mdcvacuum.com/DisplayContentPage.aspx?d=MDC&cc=33c1ded3-4381-4d1b-8eed-bd5622ccaa5f

To install a suitable hole is made in the machine shop, and the electrical feedthrough is welded in place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi:

Well at the moment I made the video there were no sensors in the Pr chamber. The Pr Sensor is installed in the hose coming out of the container (the Pr is the same). The temp Sensor is placed in the PC Board next to the Pneumatic System where it can measure the temp of the ambient air which is fed to the container. At this moment I had a Pr Chamber manufactured at a machine shop and I added another temp sensor to it by threading it in a threaded hole I made in the metal used for the Chamber.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
7K