Volume of a Non-Coplanar Hexahedron

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The volume of a non-coplanar hexahedron can be accurately calculated using the Jacobian method, even when two opposite faces are not coplanar. The key to obtaining the correct volume lies in evaluating the Jacobian at the appropriate location, specifically at the vertices of the hexahedron rather than at the center of the parametric element. This adjustment ensures accurate integration for 3D elements, resolving previous calculation errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hexahedron geometry and properties
  • Familiarity with Jacobian calculations in 3D space
  • Knowledge of shape functions used in finite element analysis
  • Basic principles of parametric integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Jacobians in 3D finite element analysis
  • Explore advanced techniques for calculating volumes of non-coplanar geometries
  • Learn about doubly ruled surfaces and their properties
  • Investigate the use of shape functions in various dimensional elements
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and computer graphics professionals involved in geometric modeling and volume calculations of complex shapes.

Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to calculate the volume of a hexahedron. I know how to do this for any arbitrary hexahedron as long as the 4 points of each face are coplanar (by using shape functions to calculate the Jacobian in a parametric space or using 5 tetrahedrons). However, the catch is that two of the faces are not coplanar. Two of the faces opposite of each other are not coplanar while the 4 surrounding sides are. If it is MUCH easier to do this computation with only one side non-coplanar, then I'd still be interested in that as well.

I know the location of all 8 vertices, but I can't figure out how to get the area of the non-coplanar hexahedron.

The non-coplanar surfaces would be doubly ruled surfaces as the one shown below:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/Hyperbolic-paraboloid.svg"


Thanks,
Scott
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hm...I've found the solution. For anyone that stumbles upon this in the future...

The Jacobian DOES work, even for those non-coplanar faces. My mistake was that I was integrating the Jacobian evaluated at the center of the parametric element. For a 2D element using the shape functions I use, this works. But for a 3D element, this does not work. I now get the correct answer.

-Scott
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K