MHB Volume of Solid of Revolution about Oblique Axis - Kyle's Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a solid formed by revolving the region bounded by the graphs of y=x and y=x^2 about the line y=x. The provided solution utilizes a specific formula for solids of revolution about an oblique axis, leading to the determination of the volume as pi/(30sqrt(2)). The integration process involves finding the limits of integration and expanding the integrand. The final calculation confirms the volume matches the book's answer. This method illustrates the application of calculus in determining volumes of solids of revolution.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Find the volume of the solid formed by revolving about y=x?

Find the volume of the solid formed by revolving the region bounded by the graphs of y=x and y=x^2 about the line y=x

Additional Details:

The book's given answer is pi/(30sqrt(2))

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Kyle,

Please see http://mathhelpboards.com/math-notes-49/solid-revolution-about-oblique-axis-rotation-6683.html for the development of the general formula:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{\left(m^2+1 \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}}\int_{x_i}^{x_f} \left(f(x)-mx-b \right)^2\left(1+mf'(x) \right)\,dx$$

We first find $x_i$ and $x_f$:

$$x^2=x$$

$$x(x-1)=0$$

Hence:

$x_i=0,\,x_f=1$

We are given:

$m=1,\,b=0,\,f(x)=x^2\implies f'(x)=2x$

Hence:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}\int_{0}^{1} \left(x^2-x \right)^2(1+2x)\,dx$$

Expanding the integrand, we have:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}\int_{0}^{1} 2x^5-3x^4+x^2 \,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we find:

$$V=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}\left[\frac{1}{3}x^6-\frac{3}{5}x^5+\frac{1}{3}x^3 \right]_{0}^{1}$$

$$V=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{3}{5}+\frac{1}{3} \right)=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{1}{15} \right)=\frac{\pi}{30\sqrt{2}}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top