Volume using pseudo-spherical coordinates

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter conservative
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the volume of a two-sheeted hyperboloid using both rectangular and pseudo-spherical coordinates. The user expresses confidence in the calculations performed in rectangular coordinates but seeks validation for the pseudo-spherical approach, which utilizes mapped coordinates rather than real coordinates. A key point of contention is the transformation definition, specifically the relationship between $\rho^2$ and the hyperboloid's coordinates, highlighting the equation $\rho^2 \cosh(2\chi) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2$ as crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conic sections and their volumes
  • Familiarity with hyperboloid geometry
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations, particularly pseudo-spherical coordinates
  • Proficiency in hyperbolic functions, specifically cosh and sinh
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the mathematical properties of two-sheeted hyperboloids
  • Study coordinate transformations in non-Euclidean geometry
  • Explore the application of hyperbolic functions in volume calculations
  • Investigate common errors in volume calculations across different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and researchers involved in geometry, particularly those working with hyperbolic structures and coordinate transformations.

conservative
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The volume of a conic section should be the same regardless of the coordinate system used. Thus, I have attempted to calculate the volume of a two-sheeted hyperboloid in both rectangular and psuedo-spherical coordinates (q.v. attached pdf file). I am fairly confident the calculations in rectangular coordinates are correct, but much less so for the pseudo-spherical coordinates. The psuedo-spherical coordinates do not really represent real coordinates, rather they are mapped coordinates. Be that as it may, I would welcome someone who can identify the error(s) in my work.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I think you intend that $$\rho^2 = x^2 + y^2+z^2$$ but as you have defined your transformation $$\rho^2 \cosh(2\chi)= x^2 + y^2+z^2$$ because ##cosh^2(\chi) + sinh^2(\chi) = cosh(2\chi)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K