Vortex loop stabilization in SU(N) gauge theory - DBI term approach

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the stabilization of vortex solutions in SU(N) gauge theories with adjoint scalars, specifically exploring the potential of a DBI-type term to provide a mechanism for stabilizing closed vortex loops known as vortons. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, references to existing literature, and challenges related to the application of DBI terms in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that including a DBI-type term could stabilize vortons by contributing an energy dependent on the extrinsic curvature of the loop.
  • The proposed energy expression indicates that the first term tends to shrink the loop while the second term diverges as the radius approaches zero, suggesting a balance that could lead to stability under certain conditions.
  • Another participant requests references discussing vortex solutions in SU(N) gauge theories, indicating a need for foundational literature on the topic.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates the request for references, emphasizing the importance of established theories and problems in the discussion.
  • One participant provides specific references related to vortex solutions and the stability problem, highlighting the established understanding of vortex collapse due to line tension and the role of angular momentum in stabilizing configurations.
  • The participant also contrasts the traditional approach of using angular momentum with their DBI-type mechanism, arguing that it could offer stabilization without the need for superconducting strings.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the DBI mechanism, suggesting that it relies on geometric properties rather than conserved charges, which could be advantageous in certain scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the topic and the literature, with some seeking references while others provide them. There is no consensus on the effectiveness or validity of the DBI-type approach compared to traditional methods, indicating ongoing debate and exploration.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of vortex stabilization mechanisms and the potential limitations of existing approaches. The reliance on curvature-dependent energy introduces additional considerations that may not be fully resolved in the current dialogue.

vorker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Can a DBI-type term stabilize vortons in SU(N) gauge theory? The curvature-dependent energy appears to balance line tension at a specific radius. Looking for feedback on whether this mechanism is physically sound.
I've been studying vortex solutions in SU(N) gauge theories with adjoint scalars. The standard problem is that vortons (closed vortex loops) are unstable and collapse due to line tension. However, I've found that including a DBI-type term (similar to those in string theory effective actions) might provide a stabilization mechanism.


The key point: the DBI term contributes an energy that depends on the extrinsic curvature K of the loop. For a circular vorton of radius R, the total energy becomes:


##E(R) = 2\pi R \mu + \frac{2\pi R}{\Lambda^4}\left[\sqrt{1 + \frac{\Lambda^4}{R^2}} - 1\right]##


where μ is the vortex tension and Λ is the DBI scale. The first term wants to shrink the loop, while the second term diverges as R→0.


Minimizing this gives an equilibrium radius:


##R_{eq} = \frac{\Lambda}{\sqrt{\mu \Lambda^4 - 1}}##


This exists when μ > Λ^(-4), suggesting a parameter regime where vortons are stable.

Has anyone encountered similar stabilization mechanisms for topological defects? Are there known issues with applying DBI terms in this context? Any relevant references would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vorker said:
vortex solutions in SU(N) gauge theories with adjoint scalars
Can you give a reference that discusses such theories?
 
PeterDonis said:
Can you give a reference that discusses such theories?
I can share a more detailed overview of the study with proper references. I just need a bit of time to tidy it up and make it presentable for the forum.
 
vorker said:
I can share a more detailed overview of the study with proper references. I just need a bit of time to tidy it up and make it presentable for the forum.
I'm not asking for your personal research. That's off limits for discussion here anyway. I'm asking for references that discuss the kinds of theories you mention and the "standard problem" you describe.
 
PeterDonis said:
I'm not asking for your personal research. That's off limits for discussion here anyway. I'm asking for references that discuss the kinds of theories you mention and the "standard problem" you describe.
vortex solutions in SU(N) gauge theories:
vorton stability problem:
  • Martins & Shellard (1998) - https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9804378 - See page 2: "If a superconducting string loop has an angular momentum, it is semi-classically conserved, and it tries to resist the loop's tension... otherwise it is possible that dynamically stable loops form. These are called vortons—they are stationary rings that do not radiate classically"
The "standard problem" I mentioned is that vortex loops normally collapse due to their line tension. The established solution in the literature involves currents on the string creating angular momentum that balances this tension - as the Martins & Shellard paper states, this angular momentum "resists the loop's tension" and can lead to stable configurations. this approach has limitations.

The DBI-type approach I'm exploring would provide stabilization through a different mechanism - using curvature-dependent energy rather than angular momentum from currents. The reason I'm interested in this alternative is that it could provide geometric stabilization without requiring the strings to be superconducting. The DBI mechanism depends only on the loop's curvature, not on conserved charges that could potentially leak away.
Instead of relying on angular momentum from currents, I'm using the geometry itself. The DBI term makes the vortex energy depend on its curvature - essentially, the vortex becomes "stiffer" when you try to bend it too much. It's like the difference between a rubber band and a garden hose: the hose resists tight bending not because it's spinning, but because bending costs energy.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K