Ward-Takahashi identity and renormalization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Ward-Takahashi (WT) identity is crucial for ensuring the renormalizability of quantum field theories, particularly Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). It preserves gauge invariance at the quantum level, which prevents quantum fluctuations from breaking this invariance. The WT identity is essential for the Dyson renormalizability of theories with local Abelian gauge symmetries, ensuring that divergent parts of amplitudes cancel. Additionally, while massive spin-one fields are often considered non-renormalizable, the Standard Model remains renormalizable due to its non-Abelian gauge symmetry and the Higgs mechanism, which provides mass without breaking gauge invariance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Familiarity with gauge symmetries and invariance
  • Knowledge of renormalization techniques in quantum field theory
  • Basic concepts of the Higgs mechanism and spontaneous symmetry breaking
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Ward-Takahashi identity in QED
  • Explore the Dyson renormalization process in quantum field theories
  • Investigate the Higgs mechanism and its role in the Standard Model
  • Learn about the Stückelberg model and its applications to renormalizable theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly theoretical physicists and quantum field theorists, as well as students and researchers interested in the renormalization of quantum field theories and gauge invariance principles.

samuelr85
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What I don't understand about WT identity is how it allows or helps you to renormalize a quantum field theory (es. QED). Not in details, just the basic ideas, if possible.
Thanks in advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not entirely sure but I've heard that a massive spin one field is non-renormalizable. The gauge symmetry of the photon "protects" the photon from being non-renormalizable. The Ward-Takahashi identity says that gauge invariance is preserved at the quantum level. So I guess the Ward-Takahashi identity tells you that quantum fluctuations don't break gauge invariance and hence the renormalizability of the theory.
 
Thanks for your answer, it make sense. Do you think you need to explicitly use the WT identities for showing that the divergent parts of the amplitudes cancel each other, at a given order of perturbation theory? Or that cancellation is it just a consequence of the presence of gauge invariance?
 
Indeed, the Ward-Takahashi identities for local Abelian gauge symmetries are necessary for the Dyson renormalizability of such theories like QED. E.g., from naive power counting the four-photon vertex is logarithmically divergent. However, the WTI for this vertex ensures that it is finite. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

It is also not true that massive vector fields lead necessarily to non-renormalizable models. E.g., the standard model is renormalizable although the W- and Z-bosons are massive. This is due to the fact that this theory is still a non-Abelian gauge theory, i.e., the action is invariant under local gauge transformations, but this local symmetry is spontaneously broken. This provides mass to the gauge bosons without breaking gauge invariance, and thus the theory stays renormalizable. This Higgs mechanism predicts the existence of a massive scalar boson, the famous Higgs boson.

For the Abelian case, one can give the gauge boson even a mass by hand (i.e., without using spontaneous symmetry breaking of the local gauge symmetry), and still keep the theory invariant under local gauge transformations. This is the Stückelberg model, rediscovered by Kroll, Lee, and Zumino to build an effective renormalizable theory for the (neutral) light vector mesons, \rho, \quad \omega, and \phi:

Kroll, N. M., Lee, T. D., and Zumino, B.: Neutral Vector Mesons and the Hadronic Electromagnetic Current , Phys. Rev. 157, volume 157, 1376, 1967
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K