- #1
ohwilleke
Gold Member
- 2,657
- 1,619
- TL;DR
- Freeman Dyson concluded in a highly cited 2013 talk that a single graviton cannot be detected, even in theory. Why did he reach this conclusion, and is it widely accepted?
Dyson concluded that the detection of single gravitons is not physically possible, according to this pre-print, citing Freeman Dyson, "Is A Graviton Detectable?", Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330041 (2013) (which has at least 94 citations).
This was a conclusion that he made in an "Invited talk given at the Conference in Honour of the 90th Birthday of Freeman Dyson, Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 26–29 August 2013." This was basically his own keynote speech at a Festschrift convened in honor of his 90th birthday (he died six and a half year later, on February 28, 2020).
The brief excerpt from his talk available in lieu of an abstract states (after some introductory thank you's and formalities) that:
Obviously, this omits all the good stuff.
1. What was the gist of the reasoning behind his conclusion?
I ask, because the published version of the talk is not an open access paper, it does not appear to have a counterpart on arXiv, and I don't have access to the journal through, e.g., a university library subscription.
2. Is his conclusion on this point widely accepted?
I ask because some of Dyson's most notable ideas (across an exceptionally broad range of fields) are controversial or speculative, although others have near universal acceptance.
Also, many famous scientists tend to make some of their most controversial statements in the final years of their careers, and this statement was definitely one of his last notable pronouncements about physics.
So, it cannot be taken for granted that this conclusion was widely accepted even though he was an eminent physicist. On the other hand, because he was such an eminent physicist, no conclusion he reached about physics can be dismissed out of hand.
This was a conclusion that he made in an "Invited talk given at the Conference in Honour of the 90th Birthday of Freeman Dyson, Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 26–29 August 2013." This was basically his own keynote speech at a Festschrift convened in honor of his 90th birthday (he died six and a half year later, on February 28, 2020).
The brief excerpt from his talk available in lieu of an abstract states (after some introductory thank you's and formalities) that:
Obviously, this omits all the good stuff.
1. What was the gist of the reasoning behind his conclusion?
I ask, because the published version of the talk is not an open access paper, it does not appear to have a counterpart on arXiv, and I don't have access to the journal through, e.g., a university library subscription.
2. Is his conclusion on this point widely accepted?
I ask because some of Dyson's most notable ideas (across an exceptionally broad range of fields) are controversial or speculative, although others have near universal acceptance.
Also, many famous scientists tend to make some of their most controversial statements in the final years of their careers, and this statement was definitely one of his last notable pronouncements about physics.
So, it cannot be taken for granted that this conclusion was widely accepted even though he was an eminent physicist. On the other hand, because he was such an eminent physicist, no conclusion he reached about physics can be dismissed out of hand.
Last edited: