News Was Kerry to Blame for 9/11?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemicalsuperfreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fault News
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the blame attributed to John Kerry regarding the security lapses that contributed to the 9/11 attacks. Participants argue that while Kerry forwarded information about security issues at Logan International Airport to the Bush administration, he should have anticipated their incompetence. The conversation highlights the media's role in shaping narratives and the political maneuvering surrounding the events leading up to 9/11, with several users emphasizing that both Kerry and the Bush administration share responsibility for the failures. The discussion also critiques the media's focus on sensationalism over substantive political discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the events leading up to 9/11
  • Familiarity with the roles of key political figures, including John Kerry and George W. Bush
  • Knowledge of media influence on public perception and political narratives
  • Awareness of the security protocols at Logan International Airport
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the timeline of security measures at Logan International Airport prior to 9/11
  • Examine the political dynamics between the Clinton and Bush administrations regarding terrorism warnings
  • Investigate the role of media in political discourse during election cycles
  • Explore the implications of deregulation on national security oversight
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political analysts, historians studying the 9/11 attacks, media critics, and anyone interested in the interplay between politics and public safety. It provides insights into the complexities of accountability in government and the influence of media narratives on public opinion.

  • #31
OMG Kerry was told that our airport security sucked and he didn't do anything about it?! The terrorist attack must be his fault! Thousands of deaths are on his shoulders now! Burn him!

Hind sight is 20-20. If you put yourself in his place, you'll see that he did the right thing. He forwarded the issue to the department that handles those issues.

He doesn't have the right to claim that he was a whistle blower because he didn't take any extra effort in making sure that it was taken care of, but that's beside the point. To blame him for weak airport security is like blaming the Post Office for your phone bill being incorrect.

I think the motive behind this was not to make Kerry look dirty, but to draw attention away from the Bush administration. I think it's obvious that nobody would hold this against Kerry, but they might be less inclined to hold the blame to the Bush administration because it was obviously "everybody's fault" that this happened.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Of course, 9-11 is automatically President Bush's fault! It had NOTHING to do with the administration before him, that's for sure...
 
  • #33
This thing with Kerry seems to be a distractionary tactic to keep from asking the tough questions like this one-

"Andrews Air Force Base is a huge military installation just 10 miles from the Pentagon. On 11 September there were two entire squadrons of combat-ready fighter jets at Andrews. Their job was to protect the skies over Washington D.C. They failed to do their job. Despite over one hour's advance warning of a terrorist attack in progress, not a single Andrews fighter tried to protect the city. The FAA, NORAD and the military have cooperative procedures by which fighter jets automatically intercept commercial aircraft under emergency conditions. These procedures were not followed." If the FAA is required by law to notify the US government of a reported hijacking, as they did before the first hit at the WTC, why then, with well over half and hour before the attack on the pentagon, were no preventive military actions taken by Andrews Air Force Base?

http://unansweredquestions.org/topic.php?tid=45
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
More than 11 weeks later, Kerry finally replied to his well-informed and anxious constituent. "I have forwarded your tape to the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General [DOT OIG]," he said in a brief July 24, 2001, letter, a copy of which I've obtained.
He did a hell of a lot more than Bush did about it. If anything in the article is true, it shows that there was a reaction to the possibility of a terrorist strike. But "oh what could Bush have done?" Kill Bin Laden.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1K ·
34
Replies
1K
Views
96K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K