kasse
- 383
- 1
Is it true that the housing bubble was created because the housing market was practically 100% unregulated?
The discussion revolves around the causes of the housing bubble, particularly focusing on the roles of regulation and low interest rates. Participants explore various factors including lending practices, market perceptions, and the impact of interest rates on buyer behavior.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the primary cause of the housing bubble, with multiple competing views remaining on the influence of regulation, lending practices, and market psychology.
Participants express varying assumptions about the impact of interest rates and regulation, and the discussion includes references to specific lending practices and market conditions that may not be universally applicable.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/jan-june09/andrews_05-21.html...PAUL SOLMAN: Andrews applied for, and got, a no-ratio loan, in which his $2,500 monthly payments would consume nearly all his take-home pay.
No-ratio?
EDMUND ANDREWS: A no-ratio mortgage in which literally I left the income space blank.
PAUL SOLMAN: Therefore, there would be no ratio.
EDMUND ANDREWS: Correct, yes, because there was an issue of my debt-to-income ratio. But if you don't have any income that you're declaring, you have no debt-to-income ratio. Problem solved. Even at the time, I'm going, "I can't believe this. Is this a great country or what?"...
kasse said:Is it true that the housing bubble was created because the housing market was practically 100% unregulated?