Wave function,probability,normalization,etc.

  • Thread starter Thread starter prehisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


-∞<pi<∞
N-normalization multiple

f(px)=N*exp(-[itex]\alpha[/itex]px)
1)normalize wave function to 1
2) find probability distrubution px
2) find avarage value and dispersion for px

Homework Equations



So for normalization i have to find N value when [itex]\int[/itex] (from -∞ to ∞)[N*exp(-[itex]\alpha[/itex]px)]^2=1
Am I right ?
either way when I am tried to solve this integral, i obtained -> -N^2=1
Could it be right ?

The Attempt at a Solution


 
on Phys.org
Your integral diverges, are you sure there's no square or absolute value involved?
 
Goddar said:
Your integral diverges, are you sure there's no square or absolute value involved?

Right now i have only this example ,checked - there is nothing more to it.
I will check the source and let you know.
 
prehisto said:

Homework Statement


-∞<pi<∞
N-normalization multiple

f(px)=N*exp(-[itex]\alpha[/itex]px)
1)normalize wave function to 1
2) find probability distrubution px
2) find avarage value and dispersion for px

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



So for normalization i have to find N value when [itex]\int[/itex] (from -∞ to ∞)[N*exp(-[itex]\alpha[/itex]px)]^2=1
Am I right?
Yes, that would be the normalization condition.

Either way when I tried to solve this integral, I obtained -> -N^2=1
Could it be right ?
No. First, as Goddar noted, the integral you wrote down diverges. Second, even if it didn't, your N would cause the integral to be negative, not +1.