Wave Interference at Radio Station Antennas

  • Thread starter Thread starter llamajuice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether constructive or destructive interference occurs at a radio station with two antennas broadcasting in phase. The first antenna is 7.00 km away, and the second is 8.12 km away, with a frequency of 536 kHz. The wavelength is calculated to be approximately 560 meters. Constructive interference occurs when the path difference between the two waves is an integer multiple of the wavelength, while destructive interference occurs when the path difference is a half-integer multiple. The conclusion indicates that the interference at the listener's location is constructive based on the calculations provided.
llamajuice
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The transmitting antenna for a radio station is 7.00km from your house. The frequency of the electromagnetic wave broadcast is 536kHz. The station builds a 2nd transmitting antenna that broadcasts an identical em wave in phase with the 1st one. The new antenna is 8.12km from your house. Show whether constructive or destructive interference occurs at your radio.

Homework Equations


v=f╗
v = c = 3 x 10^8 m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


So I found the wavelength: v/f 5.6x 10^2m, but I don't know how to tell when constructive or destructive interference occurs.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
u r lacking some quantities. The question should also include where is the 2nd transmitting antenna. Let it be d
Then if u find that d=m(lambda) where m=0,1,2... then its a constructive interference.
 
Oh I forgot to put that the new antenna is 8.12km from the house.
So if d = m(lambda) its constructive interference and if d just doesn't = m(lambda) then its destructive interference?
 
no if d=(m+1/2)(lambda) then it will be destructive. also if both doesn't follow then it will be intermediate between two
 
oh ok its a constructive.. as 1120/560 = 2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top