Wave Particle Duality: Magnifying Power of Electron Microscope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the limitations of optical microscopes due to the wavelength of light and the potential advantages of using electron microscopes, specifically in the context of calculating the de Broglie wavelength of electrons accelerated through a potential difference of 50,000V compared to red light (500nm).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to calculate the de Broglie wavelength of an accelerated electron and explore the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum. There are attempts to derive formulas and clarify the implications of relativistic effects on calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on deriving the momentum of the electron and calculating its wavelength, while others express uncertainty about the appropriateness of using classical mechanics versus relativistic mechanics in their calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the potential need to consider relativistic effects due to the high speeds of the electrons, which may complicate the calculations. Participants are also navigating the assumptions related to the kinetic energy of electrons and the equations involved.

Dinno
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Microscopes are inherently limited by the wavelength of the light used. How much smaller (in order of magnitude) can we "see" using an electron microscope whose electrons have been accelerated through a potential difference of 50,000V than using red light(500nm)?

Homework Equations



k=1/2mv2


The Attempt at a Solution



Don't know how to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would need to calculate the Debroglie wavelength of this highly accelerated electron. I'm going to assume that they taught you the equation for debroglie wavelength.

Apparently wave-partiicle duality describes every massive object as exhibiting wave like behaviour at high speeds.

You know that the kinetic of an electron = eV
1/2mv^2 = eV

But you need to find the momentum (p = mv) of this said electron in order to work out it's wavelength.

Have a go at deriving this momentum of electron formula in terms of it's kinetic energy, if you can't I will help you.

Anywho, if you manage, plug in the numbers for momentum, then plug momentum into your de broglie equation. The wavelengths will obviously be different than that of red light, you may then decide why it is better to use electrons.
 
Thank you for your help,
I am not sure if I'm on the right track but I used the kinetic energy formula to find velocity then I used that velocity in the lambda=h/mv formula to find the wavelength, is that right?
 
No.

If you simply equated eV = 1/2mv^2, you would end up getting a relativistic value for the speed which is ridiculous.

-----------------------------------------

Here is how to derive the momentum of an electron:

p = mv (1)

eV = 1/2mv^2 (2)

These are 2 separate expressions

What we can do to number (2) is rearrange it for v and substitute into equation number (1)#

So number (2) becomes:

sqrt(2eV/m) = v (where aqrt stands for square root). Substitute this into v for (1):

p = m sqrt(2eV/m)

Square both sides and get rid of one of the m's, and square root again. Final expression for momentum should be:

p = sqrt(2meV)

h (plancks constant) is 6.63E-34

You should end up getting a wavelength of 5.49E-12m, I'm sure you can imagine why this would give a better resolution (when veiwing a microscope) than an optical microscope with wavelengths of 500nm.

----------------------------------

HOWEVER

I'm unsure whether to bring relativity into this. Because I did use KE = eV straight off the bat and the electron was moving at an extremely relativistic velocity. I decided I would calculate it's momentum by using it's rest mass, kinetic energy and total energy, but I ended up with an unuseable value. If you were supposed to apply laws of relativity to this equation then ignore what I said.

Can a more experienced individual please advise, I don't want to give some wrong answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K