Wave speed of a transversing guitar string?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem related to the wave speed of a vibrating guitar string in its fundamental mode. The original poster describes the parameters of the problem, including the length of the string segment and the maximum transverse acceleration and velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the wave speed using given parameters but expresses uncertainty about the equations to apply. Some participants suggest relationships between maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, and angular frequency, while others clarify the correct wavelength for a string with nodes at both ends.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and discussing the relationships between variables. There is a progression in understanding as the original poster realizes the correct wavelength for the string, leading to a resolution of the wave speed calculation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the application of wavelength formulas, specifically distinguishing between conditions for tubes and strings. The original poster initially misapplies the wavelength for a tube instead of the correct one for a string.

magician13134
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm completely stuck on a homework question and I really don't even know where to start...

A guitar string is vibrating in its fundamental mode, with nodes at each end. The length of the segment of the string that is free to vibrate is 0.382 m. The maximum transverse acceleration of a point at the middle of the segment is 9000 m/s2 and the maximum transverse velocity is 3.90 m/s.

Part (a) asked "What is the amplitude of this standing wave?" and I was able to correctly get A=1.69×10−3m

Now part (b) is asking "What is the wave speed for the transverse traveling waves on this string?" and I don't even know what equations to use. If someone could just point me in the right direction, tell me a useful equation, or give me a little hint, that would be great :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what you probably did to solve a) was this:

\frac{a_{max}}{v_{max}} = \omega

\frac{v_{max}}{\omega} = A

You know that v = \lambda f or alternatively v = \frac{2\pi f}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} = \frac{\omega}{k}

You know omega from a) and you can figure out k easily so that's what you should do for b).
 
AtticusFinch said:
So what you probably did to solve a) was this:

\frac{a_{max}}{v_{max}} = \omega

\frac{v_{max}}{\omega} = A

You know that v = \lambda f or alternatively v = \frac{2\pi f}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} = \frac{\omega}{k}

You know omega from a) and you can figure out k easily so that's what you should do for b).

Ok, so I'm trying to work that out, but I still can't seem to get the right answer.

So I know \omega = 9000/3.9 = 2308 and that v = \frac{\omega}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} and... I think \lambda = 4L, right? So I got 561.2, but apparently that's not right. Did I mess up with \lambda = 4L (using 0.382 for L) or is there something else I'm missing? :confused:

Oh, and thanks!Oh shoot, \lambda = 4L is only for tubes, isn't it... Shoot. Ok, I'll keep working at it.
 
magician13134 said:
Oh shoot, \lambda = 4L is only for tubes, isn't it... Shoot. Ok, I'll keep working at it.

Yes it's only for tubes. You need to find what the wavelength would be for a string with nodes at both ends (just draw a wave that only has two nodes).
 
It was \lambda = 2L, so the answer was just 281Thanks for your help :biggrin:
 
magician13134 said:
It was \lambda = 2L, so the answer was just 281


Thanks for your help :biggrin:

Yep, good job.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K