Undergrad What is the Wave Function and How Does it Compare to the Schrodinger Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xilus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
Click For Summary
The wave function is a mathematical construct in quantum mechanics that lacks a clear physical meaning and cannot be directly measured. It evolves according to the Schrodinger equation, which is one of several equations governing quantum systems. The wave function is not an observable, but its absolute square represents the probability density of finding a particle at a specific location. Interpretations of the wave function, such as the Copenhagen and Many-Worlds interpretations, attempt to provide philosophical context to its mathematical framework. Despite the various interpretations, they yield identical experimental predictions, highlighting the complexity of understanding quantum mechanics.
Xilus
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What is the wave function? does it have several different forms?
how does the Schrodinger equation compare to the wave function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xilus said:
What is the wave function? does it have several different forms?
how does the Schrodinger equation compare to the wave function?
The wave function is a mathematical construct that has no (or many) clear physical meaning. The Schrodinger equation is one of a handful of equations (Dirac and Klein-Gordon are the main alternative single particle equations) governing the evolution of this wave in space and time. The math behind quantum mechanics and its physical predictions are well defined, but interpreting what it means is much more complicated. The wave function itself is not a physical observable, meaning you can never measure or see it. This has given way to a huge number of interpretations of quantum mechanics, which attempt to give a philosophical meaning to the math. The two most common are:

Copenhagen interpretation, which treats the wave function as a 'real' object that collapses into a classical value under measurement. This is basically just a literal interpretation of the underlying equations
Many-worlds interpretation, which treats every possible classical world allowed by the wave function as a distinct universe. Here, measurement merely splits the universe around the observer, producing multiple observers which each measure something different.

These are just two though. There are an endless number of interpretations which, by definition, predict the exact same outcomes to any experiment and are therefore indistinguishable
 
Thanks for the response. Can you explain more of the mathematics of the wave function?
Is this it?
wavefunction.png
 
This is the 1-dimensional time-independent Schrodinger equation for a free particle. So by using this equation, as opposed to the general one, you're making some assumptions:
1) 1-dimensional: this particle is confined to 1 spatial dimension
2) time-independent: this particle has a fixed energy (i.e. it is an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian)
3) free: this particle is not under any external forces, which would produce a potential energy term
Given the restrictive nature of this equation, the solution can be easily expressed as
\Psi(x) = Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx}
where A and B must be determined by boundary and normalization conditions.

As I mentioned above, the wave function isn't a physical observable. However, its absolute square |\Psi|^2 is, and represents the probability density for finding a particle at a point x. To calculate the probability of the particle being observed between two points a and b, you just need to integrate:
P(a,b) = \int^a_b |\Psi(x)|^2dx
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
467
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K