Waveguides and Numerical Aperture

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the calculations related to dielectric slab waveguides, specifically addressing the numerical aperture (NA) and its implications when cladding is removed, leaving air as the surrounding medium. The numerical aperture is calculated using the formula NA = √(n₁² - n₂²), where n₁ is the refractive index of the core and n₂ is that of the cladding. The participant, Keith, raises concerns about the validity of the numerical aperture exceeding 1 and its relationship with the critical angle, suggesting that the absence of cladding may lead to total internal reflection (TIR) and transform the waveguide into an optical cavity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dielectric slab waveguides
  • Familiarity with refractive indices and their significance
  • Knowledge of total internal reflection (TIR)
  • Basic principles of numerical aperture calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of cladding removal on waveguide performance
  • Study the relationship between numerical aperture and acceptance angle in optical systems
  • Explore the effects of different refractive index materials on waveguide efficiency
  • Learn about the design and analysis of optical cavities versus waveguides
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and students studying waveguide technology or optical systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the effects of refractive indices and waveguide design principles.

GreeziakAttack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

First time posting on here hope this all goes well!

I just worked through a problem on dielectric slab waveguides with core and cladding and it was pretty straight forward finding critical angle, critical angle compliment, number of modes, numerical aperture, maximum acceptance angle etc.

Now the problem asks to run through all the calculations again sans the cladding (assume its air).

Here is where my questions start:

\ NA = \sqrt{n^{2}_{1}-n^{2}_{2}} is a number greater than 1 (1.25 to be exact)

Obviously here the sine of an angle cannot be greater than 1, so what does this say about the numerical aperture and the acceptance angle? It seems that this should not be so since I have reasonable values for critical angle and its complement. I would assume that the critical angle ought to be 0 for there to be issues with numerical aperture.

Also, in general what effect does the cladding have on the quality of the waveguide? Based on the numerical aperture it seems the less optically dense the cladding (or namely the ratio of the cladding to core indices) the higher the accepting angle of the guide.

EDIT:

Thinking about this more, the case where

\ \overline{θ} \geq θ_{c}

Means we will get TIR off the core air interface at the end of the waveguide, so essentially we have no waveguide but an optical cavity because all the rays remain inside the dielectric?
Any advice is greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
Keith
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thinking about this more, the case where

\ \overline{θ} \geq θ_{c}

Means we will get TIR off the core air interface at the end of the waveguide, so essentially we have no waveguide but an optical cavity because all the rays remain inside the dielectric?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K