- #1

GreeziakAttack

- 2

- 0

Hey all,

First time posting on here hope this all goes well!

I just worked through a problem on dielectric slab waveguides with core and cladding and it was pretty straight forward finding critical angle, critical angle compliment, number of modes, numerical aperture, maximum acceptance angle etc.

Now the problem asks to run through all the calculations again sans the cladding (assume its air).

Here is where my questions start:

[itex]\ NA = \sqrt{n^{2}_{1}-n^{2}_{2}}[/itex] is a number greater than 1 (1.25 to be exact)

Obviously here the sine of an angle cannot be greater than 1, so what does this say about the numerical aperture and the acceptance angle? It seems that this should not be so since I have reasonable values for critical angle and its complement. I would assume that the critical angle ought to be 0 for there to be issues with numerical aperture.

Also, in general what effect does the cladding have on the quality of the waveguide? Based on the numerical aperture it seems the less optically dense the cladding (or namely the ratio of the cladding to core indices) the higher the accepting angle of the guide.

EDIT:

Thinking about this more, the case where

[itex]\ \overline{θ} \geq θ_{c}[/itex]

Means we will get TIR off the core air interface at the end of the waveguide, so essentially we have no waveguide but an optical cavity because all the rays remain inside the dielectric?

Any advice is greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Keith

First time posting on here hope this all goes well!

I just worked through a problem on dielectric slab waveguides with core and cladding and it was pretty straight forward finding critical angle, critical angle compliment, number of modes, numerical aperture, maximum acceptance angle etc.

Now the problem asks to run through all the calculations again sans the cladding (assume its air).

Here is where my questions start:

[itex]\ NA = \sqrt{n^{2}_{1}-n^{2}_{2}}[/itex] is a number greater than 1 (1.25 to be exact)

Obviously here the sine of an angle cannot be greater than 1, so what does this say about the numerical aperture and the acceptance angle? It seems that this should not be so since I have reasonable values for critical angle and its complement. I would assume that the critical angle ought to be 0 for there to be issues with numerical aperture.

Also, in general what effect does the cladding have on the quality of the waveguide? Based on the numerical aperture it seems the less optically dense the cladding (or namely the ratio of the cladding to core indices) the higher the accepting angle of the guide.

EDIT:

Thinking about this more, the case where

[itex]\ \overline{θ} \geq θ_{c}[/itex]

Means we will get TIR off the core air interface at the end of the waveguide, so essentially we have no waveguide but an optical cavity because all the rays remain inside the dielectric?

Any advice is greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Keith

Last edited: