Wavelength used in interference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two flat glass plates with a thin paper strip creating a wedge-shaped space, where monochromatic light is directed at the plates, resulting in an interference pattern of bright and dark fringes. The task is to determine the wavelength of the light based on the observed fringes and the geometry of the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the interference pattern and question the role of the surfaces of the glass plates in the formation of fringes. There is confusion regarding the application of various formulas related to interference and the definitions of variables such as d, n, and m.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested a formula for calculating the wavelength based on the geometry of the setup, while others express uncertainty about the definitions and applications of the variables involved. There is ongoing clarification regarding the relationship between the observed bright fringes and the underlying physics of light interference.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain information, such as specific values for d and D, and question how to interpret the angle θ in relation to the interference pattern. There is also mention of assumptions regarding the refractive index and the nature of the gap distance between the glass plates.

songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395

Homework Statement


Two flat glass plates are stacked and a thin paper strip is inserted between them at one side, creating a narrow wedge-shaped space between the plates. As shown in the figure below, monochromatic light that has a wavelength in air is directed at the plates from above. When viewed from above, parallel bright and dark fringes appear. This is the result of interference between light reflected from the bottom surface of the upper plate and light reflected from the top surface of lower plate.
1-4.jpg

When the angle between the glass plates is θ, N number of bright fringes are observed between points P and Q, whose distances from O, the point of contact between the plates, are x1 and x2 respectively. What is the value of λ? (N is sufficiently large and θ is sufficiently small to that tan θ= θ

a. (x2 - x1)θ / N
b. 2(x2 - x1)θ / N
c. (x2 - x1)/ Nθ
d. 2(x2 - x1)/ Nθ

Homework Equations


d sin θ= nλ
d y / D = nλ
w = λD/d


The Attempt at a Solution


Actually I don't really understand the question. I think the interference pattern occurs at the bottom surface of the upper plate, not at PQ because the light reflected at the bottom part of the upper plate never reaches PQ, so the light reflected by both surfaces will superimpose each other at the bottom surface of the upper plate.

I don't know how to use all the formulas I wrote above for this question. I don't have d, D, w. I even don't know how to use the distance of PQ, angle, and N given by the questions because in my opinion they can't be put in the equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump again
 
songoku said:
bump again

Use the following formula, λ=[itex]\frac{2nd}{m}[/itex]
You've been told P→Q=X[itex]_{2}[/itex]-X[itex]_{1}[/itex] but you want the gap distance which is P→Q*θ. You also know N is max number of constructive interference (max possible value for m in above equation)

The new formula becomes 2(X[itex]_{2}[/itex]-X[itex]_{1}[/itex])θ/ Nif you want to read more about this look into Thin film optical coating. (this is what happens when you get a multicoated lens on glasses)

Hope this helps
 
bayan said:
Use the following formula, λ=[itex]\frac{2nd}{m}[/itex]
You've been told P→Q=X[itex]_{2}[/itex]-X[itex]_{1}[/itex] but you want the gap distance which is P→Q*θ. You also know N is max number of constructive interference (max possible value for m in above equation)

The new formula becomes 2(X[itex]_{2}[/itex]-X[itex]_{1}[/itex])θ/ N

Hope this helps

Sorry I can't follow you. I never see that kind of formula. Can I know what is the formula about?

In your formula, what is n and m?

I assume d is the gap distance; and by gap distance do you mean that it is the distance between slits such as in double slit experiment?

I still don't get how to use the information given from the question. Let say PQ is the screen; in the formula d sin θ = nλ, d should be the distance where the light comes from ,which is above, but there is no slits drawn in the figure. θ in the formula also should be angle between the center bright and certain orde of interference and in this case should be measured vertically, not horizontally as given. n is the orde observed so if N is the number of bright fringes observed between PQ, I think n = (N/2 - 1) ??

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Sorry I can't follow you. I never see that kind of formula. Can I know what is the formula about?

In your formula, what is n and m?

I assume d is the gap distance; and by gap distance do you mean that it is the distance between slits such as in double slit experiment?

I still don't get how to use the information given from the question. Let say PQ is the screen; in the formula d sin θ = nλ, d should be the distance where the light comes from ,which is above, but there is no slits drawn in the figure. θ in the formula also should be angle between the center bright and certain orde of interference and in this case should be measured vertically, not horizontally as given. n is the orde observed so if N is the number of bright fringes observed between PQ, I think n = (N/2 - 1) ??

Thanks

The full formula is Δϕ=2π[itex]\frac{nd}{λ}[/itex] we know constructive occurs when Δϕ (phase difference is m*2π where m is fringe number)

With Δϕ=m*2π and a simple rearrangement of formula we get λ=[itex]\frac{2nd}{m}[/itex]. n in this case is refractive index. Because the gap is air we can assume a n value of 1.

With gap distance I mean the gap between two glass pieces because that is what causes the constructive/destructive interference. tan is [itex]\frac{Opposite}{Adjacent}[/itex] and you have been told that tanθ=θ therefore the gap distance (or the thickness of Thin paper strip is P→Q*θ. Subbing these into our formula to find λ we get λ= [itex]\frac{2*(X_{2}-X_{2})θ}{m}[/itex]


I think you are assuming that there is a slit experiment when in fact this is only the light interfering with itself as reflected from two different surfaces.

Hope this clears some of it up for you :)
 
bayan said:
The full formula is Δϕ=2π[itex]\frac{nd}{λ}[/itex] we know constructive occurs when Δϕ (phase difference is m*2π where m is fringe number)

With Δϕ=m*2π and a simple rearrangement of formula we get λ=[itex]\frac{2nd}{m}[/itex]. n in this case is refractive index. Because the gap is air we can assume a n value of 1.

With gap distance I mean the gap between two glass pieces because that is what causes the constructive/destructive interference. tan is [itex]\frac{Opposite}{Adjacent}[/itex] and you have been told that tanθ=θ therefore the gap distance (or the thickness of Thin paper strip is P→Q*θ. Subbing these into our formula to find λ we get λ= [itex]\frac{2*(X_{2}-X_{2})θ}{m}[/itex]


I think you are assuming that there is a slit experiment when in fact this is only the light interfering with itself as reflected from two different surfaces.

Hope this clears some of it up for you :)

Sorry for taking long time to reply.

I don't know there is formula for light interfering itself..:redface: I still have several things that not clear yet:
1.
Δϕ = 2π[itex]\frac{nd}{λ}[/itex]
m*2π = 2π[itex]\frac{nd}{λ}[/itex]
λ=[itex]\frac{nd}{m}[/itex]

How can you get λ=[itex]\frac{2nd}{m}[/itex] ?

2.
Based on the figure, which one is gap distance? The vertical distance between Q and the upper plate? If we look at triangle OQA, where A is the point on the upper plate which is directly above Q, tan θ = AQ / x2 and leads to AQ = x2 . θ ??
I don't know how to get d = (X2-X1

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K