• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Wavelengths / film / reflected light

1. Homework Statement

A film of MgF2 (n = 1.38) having thickness 1.44 x 10-5 cm is used to coat a camera lens.
What are the three longest wavelengths that are intensified in the reflected light? (Enter your answers from smallest to largest.)


2. Homework Equations
λn = λ/n

n = index of refrection

for constructive interference:
2t = (m + 1/2)λn
2nt = (m + 1/2)λ

destructive interference:
2nt = mλ

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Honestly have no idea what the question is asking...

not sure how to combine them, not sure how to find 3 biggest wavelengths

not sure if it is constructive interference or not soo

2nt = (m + 1/2)λ

2(1.38m)(0.000000144m) = (0 + 1/2)λ

(2)(1.38m)(0.000000144m) / (1/2) = λ

λ = 795 nano meters (for m = 0)

^^ Yet says it is wrong

All I can think of is to change m to 1, 2, 3 etc but don't think it works.



Suggestions??
 

Doc Al

Mentor
44,803
1,064
for constructive interference:
2t = (m + 1/2)λn
2nt = (m + 1/2)λ
This assumes that the index of refraction of the lens is less than that of the coating. What's the index of refraction of the lens?
 
It actually doesn't say it just says it for the coating.

I don't know how to find it either, any hints??
 
Last edited:

Doc Al

Mentor
44,803
1,064
I would assume that the index of refraction of the lens (presumably glass) is greater than that of the coating. How would that change your approach?
 
I don't really understand what you are trying to imply...

Would I have to use the index of refraction of the lens instead?

( I read that for crown glass, it would be n = 1.52 instead. Is this supposed to be "given" to you ? )
 

Doc Al

Mentor
44,803
1,064
Realize that there is a λ/2 phase shift upon reflection from a surface with higher index of refraction. So it matters. As I said before, just assume that the index of refraction of the lens is greater than that of the coating. That's all you need to know.
 
Realize that there is a λ/2 phase shift upon reflection from a surface with higher index of refraction. So it matters. As I said before, just assume that the index of refraction of the lens is greater than that of the coating. That's all you need to know.
I can't see how that is supposed to help :uhh:

I seriously can't find any way how to incorporate the phase shift in the problem.


Also is it right that you DO get each of the big wavelengths with m equal to 0, 1, 2, etc?
 

ehild

Homework Helper
15,360
1,766
for constructive interference:
2t = (m + 1/2)λn
2nt = (m + 1/2)λ

destructive interference:
2nt = mλ
You cited wrong conditions for constructive and destructive interference in the reflected light.
2nt = (m + 1/2)λ refers to destructive interference (minimum reflectance) and 2nt = mλ for the constructive one (maximum reflectance). The problem asks the wavelengths where constructive interference occurs.
Calculate lambda for m=1, 2, 3.

ehild
 

Doc Al

Mentor
44,803
1,064
I can't see how that is supposed to help :uhh:

I seriously can't find any way how to incorporate the phase shift in the problem.
You need to review how the formula for thin film interference is derived. Whether there is a phase shift on reflection at each surface depends on the relative index of refraction. Assuming that the index of refraction of the coating is less than that of the lens (a reasonable assumption), then your equation for constructive interference is wrong. (As ehild points out, your version describes the condition for destructive interference. But do not simply copy the formula--understand how it is derived and then you'll be good to go no matter what kind of thin film is used.)
Also is it right that you DO get each of the big wavelengths with m equal to 0, 1, 2, etc?
Yes, that's the right idea. But first get the correct formula.
 
You cited wrong conditions for constructive and destructive interference in the reflected light.
2nt = (m + 1/2)λ refers to destructive interference (minimum reflectance) and 2nt = mλ for the constructive one (maximum reflectance). The problem asks the wavelengths where constructive interference occurs.
Calculate lambda for m=1, 2, 3.

ehild
Thank you, I got it now, and I also got another problem right that I had wrong because of you saying this too !

You need to review how the formula for thin film interference is derived. Whether there is a phase shift on reflection at each surface depends on the relative index of refraction. Assuming that the index of refraction of the coating is less than that of the lens (a reasonable assumption), then your equation for constructive interference is wrong. (As ehild points out, your version describes the condition for destructive interference. But do not simply copy the formula--understand how it is derived and then you'll be good to go no matter what kind of thin film is used.)
Blah, I blame my book for not seeing that. Then again I sort of glanced over it too.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads for: Wavelengths / film / reflected light

Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
189
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
838

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top