(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A string is attached to a ring of massmwhich is free to move up and down a frictionless pole. The string is subject to tensionTand its mass per unit length is[tex]\rho[/tex]. The displacement of the string from its equilibrium position along the x -axis is y(x,t).

The boundary condition at the ring, provided [tex]\frac{\delta y}{\delta x}[/tex]<<1, is

T [tex]\frac{\delta y}{\delta x}[/tex](0,t) = m [tex]\frac{\delta^{2} y}{\delta t^{2}}[/tex](0,t)

(i) This boundary condition is the consequence of which physical law?

(ii) For the case of an incident wave y(x,t) = e[tex]^{i(-kx-\omega t)}[/tex], where [tex]\frac{\omega}{k}[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{T}{\rho}}[/tex], write the total displacement as;

y(x,t) = e[tex]^{i(-kx-\omega t)}[/tex] + re[tex]^{i(kx-\omega t)}[/tex]

Using the general boundary condition, find r as a function of k and m.

2. Relevant equations

I think everything needed to solve this question is included in the problem description.

3. The attempt at a solution

(i) I believe the boundary condition is a consequence of Newton's Second Law of Motion; the forces acting on a element of string are equated to mass times acceleration. The slope of the string is equal is equal to the tension, however, I do not understand why the left hand side is multiplied by Tension.

(ii) I have calculated the first and second derivatives wrt to x and t respectively and at x=0, the boundary condition has the following form;

T(-k +kr)ie[tex]^{i(-\omega t)}[/tex] = m(-[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] -[tex]\omega^{2}r)[/tex]e[tex]^{i(-\omega t)[/tex]

Cancelling the exponents this gives;

T(-k +kr)i = m(-[tex]\omega^{2}[/tex] -[tex]\omega^{2}r)[/tex]

From here I have tried using the relationship given in the problem statement to eliminateTbut just end up introducing another unwanted variable. I cannot seem to form a relationship involving onlykandm.

Since I need a real answer I suppose I need to remove the complex numbers in the LHS of the equation but don't see how I could achieve this.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Waves on Tight Strings: Boundary Condition Problem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**