Praise WE WON PF has been nominated for physics.org award

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Physics Forums (PF) has been nominated for the physics.org award in both the "Best revision site" and "Best Q&A site" categories, with nominations closing on October 10th. The discussion highlights the site's strengths in providing homework help and revision resources, though some participants question the appropriateness of the revision category. Members express excitement and pride over the nomination, emphasizing the community's quality and contributions. Voting for the awards will take place from October 22nd to November 7th, and participants are encouraged to vote for PF. The community is hopeful for recognition and success in the awards process.
  • #101


Borek said:
I have a feeling some of the older/professional audience perceives forums as places run by anarchistic teenagers, not a place for a serious discussion, so I am not surprised by the judges verdict.

I am present at chemical forums and at the same time I am a member of a discussion list for chemistry educators. More than once I have read at CHEMED-L that forums are place where people solve HW for others and where the drug makers share recipes. CF rules are not as stringent as PF rules, but they are very similar in the spirit, so such opinion is unjust - but it exists and my efforts to explain it is wrong didn't work. I guess something similar can be at work here.

Well, the people who think that can go to 4chan for all I care.

Woot for the People's Choice award!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102


congrats to Pf ,mentors and admin !
It truly is a great site !. well deserved for the effort.
 
  • #103


Char. Limit said:
Well, the people who think that can go to 4chan for all I care.

Beware, your chemistry prof can be one of them.
 
  • #104


Borek said:
Beware, your chemistry prof can be one of them.

And I think that she sometimes goes on 4chan.
 
  • #105


Congratulations to all!
 
  • #106


Borek said:
I have a feeling some of the older/professional audience perceives forums as places run by anarchistic teenagers, not a place for a serious discussion, so I am not surprised by the judges verdict.

...

If the "older/professional" judges voted based on their perceptions, then they've no right calling themselves professionals. It wouldn't take much effort on their part to discover that PF isn't your typical internet forum.

In any case, I'd rather have the people's vote. :approve: I'm proud to be a member of this community. Thank you to all of the mentors, homework helpers, and science advisers!
 
  • #107


Why did this dumb competition drag PF into it, anyway?

They can keep dealing out their Raspberry&Darwin Awards for all I care..
 
  • #108
Last edited:
  • #109


Congrats Greg and all of the wonderful people who work so hard to make PF such a fantastic site. You guys deserve all of the accolades you get!
 
  • #110


GeorginaS said:
Congrats Greg and all of the wonderful people who work so hard to make PF such a fantastic site. You guys deserve all of the accolades you get!
That would be all of the members including you Georgina!
 
  • #111


Evo said:
That would be all of the members including you Georgina!

Meh, I get the privilege of coming here and hanging out with some really bright and really funny people. Someone was kind enough to let me in the door. :smile:
 
  • #112


GeorginaS said:
Meh, I get the privilege of coming here and hanging out with some really bright and really funny people. Someone was kind enough to let me in the door. :smile:

My thoughts exactly.
 
  • #113


Yahaa!
I knew it, though.
 
  • #114


I love physics forum, I feel that I can ask any burning question that I have on here and it is often answered or discussed with great enthusiasm, wit and informed thinking.
well done!
 
  • #115
Last edited:
  • #116


If physics.org was serious about this competition, they would contact Greg with the scores he received from different judges under the various criteria for judgment, so he could use the feedback to improve the site. I, personally, would like to see how we scored compared to the other shortlisted sites.
 
  • #117


Gokul43201 said:
If physics.org was serious about this competition, they would contact Greg with the scores he received from different judges under the various criteria for judgment, so he could use the feedback to improve the site. I, personally, would like to see how we scored compared to the other shortlisted sites.

It looks as though 4 of the 5 judges were astro/cosmo geeks.
http://www.physics.org/featuredetail.asp?id=56"

Maybe we need to spend more time talking about stars and stuff?

Anyways, if I've said it once, I've said it twice, PF is the only forum worth paying for.

Though I did offer cash money for the archive of Dr. Neutrino after they took it off line. But the professor I contacted said it was deleted. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #118


Hurray! PF is for the people and we won the peoples award! This will look nice in our trophy case :)
 
  • #119


Of course we won, I only sent them an e-mail once a week telling them we had better win.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
11K
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Back
Top