Weak and strong equivalence- what is the difference really?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinctions between weak equivalence principle (WEP) and strong equivalence principle (SEP) in the context of gravitational physics. WEP asserts that the trajectory of a freely falling test body is independent of its internal structure, exemplified by the Universality of Free Fall. In contrast, SEP extends WEP to self-gravitating bodies and emphasizes that outcomes of local experiments are unaffected by the velocity of the apparatus or the location in the universe. The Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) encompasses these concepts, asserting the validity of WEP and the independence of local non-gravitational experiments from external conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the principles of classical mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Einstein equivalence principle (EEP)
  • Basic comprehension of scientific experimentation and measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Universality of Free Fall (UFF) and its implications in physics
  • Study the Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) in detail
  • Explore the applications of weak and strong equivalence principles in modern physics
  • Investigate experimental tests of the equivalence principles in gravitational research
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in gravitational theory, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of relativity and gravitational interactions.

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi!

My lecture notes make me really confused as to what is the difference between weak and strong equivalence. I also read about it on wikipedia, but I'm still not sure. Can anyone give an example how in real life (thought experiment?) of what weak and strong equivalence is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle seems messed up. Its statement of the strong and weak equivalence principles are basically identical. I think what they call the Einstein equivalence principle is what most people call the strong equivalence principle.
 
http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/

"One elementary equivalence principle is the kind Newton had in mind when he stated that the property of a body called “mass” is proportional to the “weight”, and is known as the weak equivalence principle (WEP). An alternative statement of WEP is that the trajectory of a freely falling “test” body (one not acted upon by such forces as electromagnetism and too small to be affected by tidal gravitational forces) is independent of its internal structure and composition. In the simplest case of dropping two different bodies in a gravitational field, WEP states that the bodies fall with the same acceleration (this is often termed the Universality of Free Fall, or UFF)."

"The Einstein equivalence principle (EEP) is a more powerful and far-reaching concept; it states that:
1. WEP is valid.
2. The outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment is independent of the velocity of the freely-falling reference frame in which it is performed.
3. The outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment is independent of where and when in the universe it is performed."

"These ideas can be summarized in the strong equivalence principle (SEP), which states that:
1. WEP is valid for self-gravitating bodies as well as for test bodies.
2. The outcome of any local test experiment is independent of the velocity of the (freely falling) apparatus.
3. The outcome of any local test experiment is independent of where and when in the universe it is performed."
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K