I Equivalence principle question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the equivalence principle, which posits that free-fall and inertial motion are indistinguishable experiences. A key point of confusion arises from the difference between coordinate acceleration, which is relative to a reference frame, and proper acceleration, which is what an accelerometer measures. While a free-falling person experiences zero proper acceleration, they are subject to coordinate acceleration of 1g relative to the Earth. This leads to the perception of acceleration during free fall, which is actually the absence of upward acceleration felt on the ground. The conversation concludes that in General Relativity, inertial frames are only valid locally, as global inertial frames do not exist due to the curvature of spacetime.
  • #31
anuttarasammyak said:
All the skydivers and the Earth have zero proper acceleration.
You mean the Earth in its orbit around the Sun?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I have not included the Sun. But even including the Sun as gravitation does not cause proper acceleration I suppose the Earth keeps zero proper acceleration.
 
  • #33
anuttarasammyak said:
But even including the Sun as gravitation does not cause proper acceleration I suppose the Earth keeps zero proper acceleration.
The Earth as a whole has zero proper acceleration on average, yes (...I'd better cover myself and say I'm handwaving a bit here because tidal gravity is a thing and I haven't completely formalised the averaging process). But the surface, and any region inside except at the very center, does have proper acceleration outwards from the center, just to be clear
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak, Dale and vanhees71
  • #34
anuttarasammyak said:
All the skydivers and the Earth have zero proper acceleration.
You have to be careful here. The surface of the Earth has non-zero proper acceleration upwards, as does almost every part of the interior of the earth. Only the very center of the Earth has zero proper acceleration.

Edit: I see that @Ibix already made the same point, and better!
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #35
anuttarasammyak said:
Re: post #12

One skydiver has his own frame of reference and another skydiver has her own frame of reference. They do not coincide but explain the events in good accordance.

For an example,
He observes the Earth coming to him with some acceleration and in its backside her coming with more acceleration.
She observes the Earth coming to her with some acceleration and in its backside him coming with more acceleration.
This is wrong, because neither skydiver's frame covers a large enough region of spacetime to include the other skydiver (or even the whole Earth--only a small portion of the Earth's surface nearest to the skydiver is covered). So neither skydiver can attribute "more acceleration" to the other skydiver than to the nearest portion of the Earth's surface.
 
  • #36
Ibix said:
But the surface, and any region inside except at the very center, does have proper acceleration outwards from the center, just to be clear
Thanks. Now I understand forces preventing every parts of the Earth free falling and keeping the shape of the Earth provide proper acceleration. For an example when I am standing, the floor push my feet to give proper acceleration g upward. Skydivers keep zero proper acceleration while falling but will start to get proper acceleration after unfortunate crash.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K