Welcome! Let's Discuss: Block on Water Surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of potential energy in the context of a block submerged in water. The original poster questions how the water gains potential energy when a block descends into it, despite the water level remaining unchanged.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the potential energy of the block and the water, questioning how energy transfer occurs without a change in water level. Some discuss the implications of Archimedes' principle and the effects of drag on the block's descent.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the energy dynamics involved as the block sinks. Some participants have offered clarifications regarding energy transfer mechanisms, while others suggest practical experiments to observe the effects of displacement and energy transfer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to consider practical demonstrations to better understand the concepts discussed, including measuring changes in water level and energy transfer during the block's descent.

Cryptic89
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Its my first thread here!
I'll start things off with a (simple?) question.
Suppose a block is suspended on a surface of water. It comprises potential energy quite obviously. As the block desends down the water level, it loses PE. According to the rules of conservation of energy, if the block is losing PE, surely the water is gaining PE. My question is how? It's not like the water level has changed! Or is it gaining PE in terms of internal energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The water level is not rising?

Then why does when I imerse my spoon in my fully loaded bol of soup, it spils everywhere?
 
um what? I don't get you...could you pls, kindly, clarify your question?
 
Cryptic89 said:
Hello all,
Its my first thread here!
I'll start things off with a (simple?) question.
Suppose a block is suspended on a surface of water. It comprises potential energy quite obviously. As the block desends down the water level, it loses PE. According to the rules of conservation of energy, if the block is losing PE, surely the water is gaining PE. My question is how? It's not like the water level has changed! Or is it gaining PE in terms of internal energy?

Let me first describe the situation I'm picturing to see if it corresponds to what you had in mind. So you have a block of something (say, lead) and it's being suspended (by say, a rope) right above the surface of some body of water. Then, we cut the rope and the block begins to sink. The first point is that it will only sink if its density is greater than that of water. Otherwise, it will float on the surface, partially submerged (see Archimedes' principle).

Quasar's point is that, as soon as it enters the water, it will be displacing some of the liquid and the water level will rise. This is true and it will lead to a rise in the water's potential energy, but it will only be a small change and will only occur until the block is completely submerged. After that, the water level will remain constant as the block falls.

Now, what happens during the fall? Well, if there were no water, the block would fall freely, losing potential energy and gaining kinetic energy (energy of motion). In the limit of a very dense mass, this is what will happen in the water as well -- there would be effectively no energy transfer between the block and the water. However, for most objects, there would be a non-negligible amount of drag as they fell through the water. This means that the water molecules would push back on the block, a force opposite to gravity. This force would do negative work (i.e. the block would do work on the water) and there would be a transfer of energy from block to water.

What form does the energy take when it's passed to the water? Well, it depends. Some of it might be transferred to thermal energy; that is, it might heat the water. An increase in temperature means that the water molecules would be moving more quickly on average, so thermal energy can be thought of as a form of kinetic energy. Another thing that can happen is that the water can gain turbulent motion. This means that, instead of an increase in the average motion of the molecules, it can produce a bulk motion of the molecules. The exact details of the energy transfer can become complicated and it will depend on other things, like the temperature of the water and the shape of the block. Hopefully you get the idea, though.
 
I couldn't explain any better than Space Tiger already has. However I fear you may question this phenonema in theory and go away discontent. So to avert such feelings from taking you over, may I please suggest you to collect a measuring container (I feel confident you possesses any type of liquid container with measurable readings etched or embedded on the side) and a considerably big (so long it fits well in the container) and heavy object. Fill the container up to a preferable reading (may I suggest a middle mark reading) and slowly emerge your chosen object on the container and wait until it hits the bottom.

Is the water level the same or has it changed with the object present? Record readings before and after if it helps
 
Last edited:
Thank you all for the responses! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K