What Advanced Math Should I Teach Myself Next?

Click For Summary
A high school freshman, who is an advanced math student, seeks recommendations for further self-study in pure mathematics after completing basic linear algebra and calculus prerequisites. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding foundational concepts before progressing to more advanced topics. Recommendations include focusing on real analysis and higher-level linear algebra and abstract algebra textbooks, with specific titles suggested such as "Dummit and Foote" for abstract algebra and "Spivak" for calculus. Some participants emphasize the need for a solid grasp of calculus before tackling real analysis, while others advocate for starting with real analysis due to the student's advanced interests. The conversation also touches on the appropriateness of questioning the student's claimed knowledge and the importance of respectful discourse in educational discussions. Overall, the thread provides a range of resources and perspectives on the best path for advanced self-study in mathematics.
  • #31
If you can find an older edition(1&2, but they are usually expensive) of Jacobs, then they are great. The newer versions seem more 'watered' down. If you cannot find those, then you should look for Larson or Sullivan, and Gelfand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
AUMathTutor said:
Granted, but it was still condescending, and that's all I was trying to point out. When I was called out on it, I specified what I meant. I don't think anybody disagrees that Hower could have been more tactful.

And I can only assume that people who ask for something know what they're getting into. The books I linked to assume a level of mathematical maturity on par with an understanding of linear algebra and possible some abstract algebra as well. The OP can probably judge for him/herself based on the level of understanding of that material how much they really know about math.

Oh well. I just think it's a little pretentious to offer advice where it isn't asked for. The OP didn't ask "do I know what I'm talking about". And he didn't make any claims beyond that he had been doing some self-study... certainly nothing to argue with. I don't disagree with suggesting that self-study may not be the most effectual method of doing things, and that making sure you have a strong grasp of the fundamentals is important, but... anyway, I think you guys see what I'm saying.

I see your point, but most students feel they have mastered elementary math in school without realizing what curriculum they are getting it from. Hence, I suggest real books to make sure that is indeed the case. If they have, nothing is lost by looking over free references.

I didn't mean anything by my remark about his age other than surprise. I know gifted people exist... in fact, that's almost all I post about. Its not my intention to slow him down at all, which is why I listed the modern books anyway in case he gets bored. I just think its safe for him to spend a couple of months getting up to speed if it is needed. Lastly, don't project overtones of your own insecurity onto me.
 
  • #33
Most of the pure math majors at my school took many college courses when they were in junior high and high school(or international equivalent). I would REALLY recommend trying to take classes from a local university, that way you will really learn the material well and get credit for your work (I mean on transcripts and resumes etc) instead of wasting your time in high school.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K