baywax
Gold Member
- 2,175
- 1
Andre said:Cancel that dating idea, as exposure dating techniques relate to exposure to atmosphere, light and cosmic rays. Obviously that doesn't work.
However there was a barnacle found between the remains, which lead to the only scientific publication about the Mega site:
First Record of the Barnacle Crustacean Genus Newmaniverruca.
Obviously this is a shallow water species and the authors could not explain how it got there at that depth of 600-700 meters. Now there is a sample to carbon date. Should not be surprized if that would be a five digit figure. Could that barnacle have lived there under normal conditions when the site made it's way to its current depth?
But then again, could somebody have thrown it in the water?
This is a good development regardless. It means there is some study being done on the site.
When I ask if the monuments like the Mayan "lighthouse", "hurricane warning system" could have been established before the Mayan nation got there... it is a bit juvenile and too simple a speculation to answer.
This is because the Maya really could have experienced the ups and downs like any civilization experiences. Take Rome for example. They enjoyed centuries of splendor and achievement then fell into disuse... then rose again as Italy with the renaissance and all sorts of progress.
The same thing could have happened with the Maya. The remains of their ancestors could well be laying on the sea bottom, across the Yucatan straight, by Cuba. These are exciting times!