What Are Degrees of Freedom and Why Do They Matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of degrees of freedom (DOF) in physics, particularly in the context of mechanical systems. Participants explore definitions, applications, and implications of degrees of freedom, including their significance in describing the state of a system in three-dimensional space and in specific examples like rigid bodies and diatomic molecules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion over the definition of degrees of freedom, suggesting it is unclear and needs further clarification.
  • One participant defines degrees of freedom as the minimum number of parameters needed to uniquely describe a system, using a point in 3D space as an example.
  • Another participant questions why three angles of rotation are necessary to specify the orientation of an object in three-dimensional space.
  • There is a contention regarding the number of angles required for rotation, with some arguing that only five are needed, while others assert that six degrees of freedom are necessary for a rigid body.
  • A distinction is made between 'quadratic' degrees of freedom and 'free' degrees of freedom, with a participant noting that rotation can be expressed using two polar coordinates and one rotation about an axis.
  • Some participants discuss specific cases, such as diatomic molecules, which have fewer rotational axes due to symmetry.
  • There is a mention of yaw, pitch, and roll as the three angles needed to define an object's orientation in 3D space.
  • One participant reiterates the definition of degrees of freedom as the minimum number of variables required to uniquely define a system's mechanical configuration, using a double pendulum as an example.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact number of degrees of freedom required for rotation, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and applications of degrees of freedom.

Contextual Notes

Some participants' claims depend on specific definitions of degrees of freedom and the context of the systems being discussed, which may not be universally applicable. There are also unresolved mathematical steps regarding the number of angles needed for rotation.

cks
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
What do you understand about this?

From high school, I just memorize the definition of it, the number of ways of obtaining energy independently. Well, it's pretty unclear by this definition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could tell us more precisely the problem you have encountered with using degrees of freedom. To put it simply, the number of degrees of freedom of a system are the minimum number of parameters you need in order to describe the system uniquely. So, for example, a point in 3 dimensional space has 3 degrees of freedom (one for each of the three dimensions). If we state which value in each dimension the point has (i.e. define the coordinate (x,y,z)) then we have uniquely specified where in space that point is. An object in 3 dimensional space has 6 degrees of freedom: three defining its position in space, and 3 defining the angles of rotation. Again, if we specify these 6 parameters, then we have uniquely described the system.
 
For your second explanation, why there are 3 angles of rotation to specify the system. ?
 
cristo said:
An object in 3 dimensional space has 6 degrees of freedom: three defining its position in space, and 3 defining the angles of rotation. Again, if we specify these 6 parameters, then we have uniquely described the system.
Surely there are only five. I think you can uniquely describe the angle of rotation of an object using only two angles of rotation.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Surely there are only five...

For a rigid body in three-space there are indeed six possible degrees of freedom.

DaveC426913 said:
I think you can uniquely describe the angle of rotation of an object using only two angles of rotation.

In most cases I would agree that you are correct indeed.
 
I think it's helpful to distinguish between 'quadratic' DOF and 'free' DOF.

Yes- rotation of an object is in general determined by 3 DOF, which could be expressed as 2 polar coordinates and 1 rotation about the axis. A diatomic molecule only has 2 rotational axes because it is symmetric about the last rotation.
 
I meant objects that have no rotational symmetry. They can be oriented in any of three directions by rotation aroind only two axes.

Wait... I just demonstrated that it DOES take 3 DoFs to uniquely describe an object. (though it may only require two to GET it there.)
 
Yaw, pitch, roll. There are three. I think you were probably just forgetting roll.
 
  • #10
cks said:
What do you understand about this?

From high school, I just memorize the definition of it, the number of ways of obtaining energy independently. Well, it's pretty unclear by this definition.
By definition, the degrees of freedom is the minimum number of variables required to uniquely define the mechanical configuration of thhe system. E.g. a double pendulum has two degress of freedom. Two variables that might be chosen are the angle each pendulum makes with the vertical.

Best wishes

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K