What are matrix elements in QFT?

Click For Summary
Matrix elements in quantum field theory (QFT) are typically calculated perturbatively, often using Feynman diagrams, which represent transitions between states. The discussion highlights that the states |p> and <p| represent Heisenberg states with momentum p at different times, specifically as In and Out states. It is emphasized that when calculating a matrix element like \langle p |\phi^4(x)|p\rangle, the bra corresponds to an Out state while the ket corresponds to an In state, making them distinct. The conversation raises the question of whether matrix elements can exist between two In states, noting that Feynman diagrams are not applicable in such cases. Ultimately, the distinction between In and Out states is crucial for understanding matrix elements in QFT, particularly in the context of interactions.
geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Suppose you want the 1-particle matrix elements of an operator in QFT, e.g.

\langle p&#039; |\phi^4(x)|p\rangle

It seems you would calculate this perturbatively by first Fourier transforming the x-variable to q, assuming an incoming particle with momentum p, an outgoing particle with momentum p', and drawing all interactions vertices but making sure to include one φ4 vertex that also has momentum q entering it.

However, if you do this, aren't |p> and |p'> the Heisenberg states that have momentum p and p' at t=-∞ and t=∞?

Does this means that in \langle p |\phi^4(x)|p\rangle,

<p| and |p> are not the same state? |p> is the Heisenberg state that looks like it has momentum p at t=-∞, while <p| is the Heisenberg state that looks like it has momentum p at t=∞. They have the same label, but they are different states (one is an In state, the other an Out state).

So when one speaks of a matrix element in QFT, does one mean a matrix element whose ket is an In state, and whose bra is an Out state? This seems to be the only type of matrix element that is calculable with Feynman diagrams?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without interaction, those states are the same. In the absence of interaction, all initial and final states are the same, your non-interaction is the identity operator and nothing happens.
Your interaction then gives transitions between states, but those states are still the same.
 
Without interaction, then in an expression like \langle p |\phi^4(x)|p\rangle, the bra and the ket are the same state: <p|p>=1.

However, with interaction, <p|p>≠1, since the bra is an Out-state, and the ket is an In-state.

It seems if you calculate \langle p |\phi^4(x)|p\rangle with Feynman diagrams, then you are calculating the matrix element between an In-state and an Out-state.

So I was wondering if a matrix element in QFT is defined as being between a ket that is an In-state, and a bra that is an Out-state.

Or can a matrix element be between two In-states for instance? If so, how would you calculate that, as it seems you can't use Feynman diagrams, as Feynman diagrams are for kets that are In-states, and bras that are Out-states.
 
geoduck said:
However, with interaction, <p|p>≠1, since the bra is an Out-state, and the ket is an In-state.
This is still 1 as you do not have an interaction here. The p states are defined as states without interaction, where "in" and "out" are meaningless.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
978
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K