What are some good books on linear algebra for a pure math major?

  • Context: Studying 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for rigorous linear algebra books suitable for a prospective pure math major. Participants share their preferences and experiences with various texts, exploring both theoretical and practical aspects of linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that college may not cover linear algebra as intensively as desired for a pure math major and seeks book recommendations.
  • Another participant mentions a preference for the Friedberg book, suggesting it has served them well.
  • A third participant recommends Sheldon Axler's "Linear Algebra Done Right" for its theoretical grounding and minimal reliance on matrix methods, highlighting its clarity and intuitive results.
  • One participant suggests visiting second-hand bookstores to find suitable books, emphasizing the importance of reading the preface and topics to gauge the book's suitability for a pure math student.
  • A participant shares their own free linear algebra notes, inviting feedback on its value while also recommending Hoffman and Kunze or Shilov as good alternatives.
  • Another participant notes the current price of Axler's book on Amazon and mentions ordering a copy.
  • One participant provides a definition of linear independence and proposes several proofs as exercises to understand the concept better.
  • A recommendation is made for "The Theory of Matrices" by Lancaster et al., with a suggestion to check for used copies.
  • Several participants discuss the coverage of linear algebra in college, with some noting that it is typically part of general education or specific to math and physics majors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the coverage of linear algebra in college, with some believing it is a general requirement while others note distinctions between applied and pure courses. There is no consensus on which specific books are the best, as multiple recommendations are provided.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the importance of understanding the intended audience and prerequisites of the recommended books, which may vary significantly. The discussion reflects a range of experiences and expectations regarding the rigor of linear algebra courses.

bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
What are some good rigorous books on linear algebra?

I am a HS senior, but I fear that college may not cover linear algebra as intensively as...well, would be preferred by a prospective pure math major (me! :redface:).
:shy:
So, what books would you suggest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theory or practical?

i like my friedberg book its served me well.
 
Theoretical: Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right.
A rigorous grounding in the theory with powerful de-emphasis of matrix methods. Without matrices, the results of the theory are very clear and intuitive. Determinants aren't even introduced (nor are they necessary) until the last chapter. There are even some cute applications in there that I haven't seen in any of those matrix theory books.
 
bomba923 said:
What are some good rigorous books on linear algebra?
I am a HS senior, but I fear that college may not cover linear algebra as intensively as...well, would be preferred by a prospective pure math major (me! :redface:).
:shy:
So, what books would you suggest?

The best thing to do is to go to the second hand bookstore and search yourself.

First, read the preface. That's very important because it tells you who the book is written for, and what they expect the reader to know.

Second, take a glance at the topics. You certainly don't want a book that's filled with topics like... "Applications to...". Not that it's a bad thing, but from my experience authors do this to make math "more" fun, but it is already FUN! This usually results in a book dependent on visualization, which, in my opinion, is not the best thing for a prospective pure math student.

Third, read some pages at the beginning, or in the middle. Try to get a feel for the book. If you don't know what the symbols are, don't let that scare you, since you will learn them as you read.

Anyways, if it turns out to be crappy, it's no big deal because you only paid $5 for it at the second hand bookstore. :biggrin:
 
JasonRox said:
Third, read some pages at the beginning, or in the middle. Try to get a feel for the book. If you don't know what the symbols are, don't let that scare you, since you will learn them as you read.
(Scare me??) Hey--if I understand the symbols in the middle of the book~~>then it already is, probably, too easy :rolleyes:
 
i have written one, it is free and covers 1 or 2 semesters of collerge level lienar algebra, and is noyl 15 pages long. goto http://www.math.uga.edu/~roy/ and take class notes #1, with my compliments.
or for a better one, goto sharipov's webpage.

or buy hoffman and kunze, or shilov. there are lots of good books out there.

i would be curious to know if my book has any value to anyone however. so far i have very little feedback.:smile:
 
Last edited:
the first thing to learn is the meaning of linear independence. here it is:

if R is any commutative ring with 1, and V is an abelian group allowing multiplication by elements of R, then a collection {a1,...an,...} of elements of V is "linearly independent over R" if and only if the only equation

c1a1+...+cmam = 0, which is true, where the a's are from the collection, nd the c's are from R, is one with all the c's equal to 0.test:

1) prove the monomials, 1, x, x^2, are linearly independent over the real numbers, but not over the ring of polynomials.

2) prove the functions 1, e^x, e^2x, are independent over the reals, but not over the ring of real valued continuous functions.

3) prove that the real numbers {1, sqrt(2)} are linearly independent over the rationals, but not over the reals.

4) prove that in the space of all pairs (a,b) of real numbers, there exist 2 independent pairs, but any three pairs are dependent (over the reals).

if you can do these you will be fine.
 
  • #10
I would HIGHLY recommend "The Theory of Matrices" by Lancaster et. al. I'm not too sure if it's even in publication any more, but it shouldn't be too hard to get a used copy--there's one at powells.com for only $22 right now! Get it!
 
  • #11
bomba923 said:
What are some good rigorous books on linear algebra?
I am a HS senior, but I fear that college may not cover linear algebra as intensively as...well, would be preferred by a prospective pure math major (me! :redface:).
:shy:
So, what books would you suggest?
Just curious as to where you think Linear Algebra will be covered if not at a univeristy? Where do you suppose Math Majors get Linear Algebra?:confused:
 
  • #12
Hmm...
I thought linear algebra was a general math course, usually taken part of general education or other requirements, for any college major (usually in the sciences).
 
  • #13
I am not sure about your school, but here we have two linear algebra classes. One is applied, the other is pure. The first is taken by engineering and cs majors, the latter is taken by math and physics majors.
 
  • #14
mathwonk said:
...commutative ring with 1, and V is an abelian group...
You lost me there. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K