What Are Some Overlooked Physics Concepts in Wrestling and Other Combat Sports?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter coolio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the application of physics concepts in wrestling and other combat sports, specifically highlighting overlooked principles beyond gravity and friction. Key concepts identified include leverage, rotation, fulcrum, momentum, and the transformation of kinetic energy during falls. The discussion emphasizes the importance of techniques such as spreading weight upon landing and using sound to dissipate energy, which can minimize impact forces. The psychological benefits of sound during falls, such as the release of endorphins, are also noted as a relevant factor in combat sports.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as gravity and friction
  • Familiarity with the laws of motion
  • Knowledge of energy transformation, particularly kinetic energy
  • Basic principles of leverage and rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of "leverage" in combat sports techniques
  • Explore the physics of "momentum" and its application in wrestling
  • Investigate the effects of "energy dissipation" techniques in martial arts falls
  • Learn about "fulcrum" mechanics and their role in grappling maneuvers
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for martial artists, physics students, coaches in combat sports, and anyone interested in the scientific principles underlying physical performance in wrestling and similar disciplines.

coolio
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble thinking some physics concept in Wrestling/Judo/Shuai Jiao/Greco Roman
Besides Gravity and friction...
Help =/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coolio said:
Hi, I'm having trouble thinking some physics concept in Wrestling/Judo/Shuai Jiao/Greco Roman
Besides Gravity and friction...
Help =/

Here is a video that shows http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=tc4PHCiKpiE" up the physics of wrestling (it contains substantial mistakes). I might give you some ideas, though. Maybe you could start with it and explain the correct physics.

You could focus on the advantage you get by lifting you opponent off the ground. Leverage or rotation are probably good ways to go, too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fulcrum, Rotation, Momentum. I pretty got all the basic concept.. I don't know any other concepts besides the basic ones.
 
coolio said:
Fulcrum, Rotation, Momentum. I pretty got all the basic concept.. I don't know any other concepts besides the basic ones.

Is this for a presentation in physics course? Have you studied any physics? I see stuff you could do with the laws of motion.
 
In judo, you learn to spread your weight when falling. Even to transform falling (kinetic) energy to noise (acoustic) by slapping the mat to reduce the shock elsewhere. It would be interesting to see just what fraction of the energy is dissipated by the slap.
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
In judo, you learn to spread your weight when falling. Even to transform falling (kinetic) energy to noise (acoustic) by slapping the mat to reduce the shock elsewhere. It would be interesting to see just what fraction of the energy is dissipated by the slap.

Looking at how you land looks like a promising way to think about physics. You can see it either as extending the time that you change your momentum or the distance over which you change your energy to minimize the force with which the ground hits you.

I learned to slap the mat in Aikido. I think the benefit of the slap must be psychological. Sound involves tiny amounts of energy. I read somewhere recently the zen-like statement that the sound of a million conversation equals the power output of flashlight.
 
I think the release of endorphines when you shout (or swear, apparently) would take some of the pain away. Only nutters and goalkeepers like doing that sort of thing! They have no nerve endings on their bodies, I think.
But the idea of lengthening the time or distance for deceleration is a very reasonable one.
 
Fewmet said:
Is this for a presentation in physics course? Have you studied any physics? I see stuff you could do with the laws of motion.

Yeah i do have the presentation. But i still need more concepts- i only have gotten 7 total.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
691
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K