What Are Some Recommended Textbooks for Learning Lie Algebras?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thrillhouse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lie algebras
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on recommendations for textbooks on Lie Algebras, specifically inquiring about "Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, And Applications" by R. Abraham, Jerrold E. Marsden, and T. Ratiu. The original poster, an engineer, seeks a practical approach to the subject without excessive mathematical rigor. Responses highlight that the book is mathematically intensive, particularly in its initial chapters, which may not align with the poster's preference for a less rigorous treatment of the material.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of Lie Algebras
  • Familiarity with tensor analysis
  • Knowledge of manifold theory
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative textbooks on Lie Algebras that focus on applications for engineers
  • Explore introductory resources on tensor analysis
  • Investigate practical applications of manifolds in engineering contexts
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics relevant to engineers
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, physicists, and students seeking practical applications of Lie Algebras and related mathematical concepts without delving deeply into pure mathematics.

thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hey All,

I want to start learning about Lie Algebras and I was wondering if anyone can recommend any good textbooks. I am an engineer, so I don't really care for a pure maths 'prove this' 'prove that' approach.

Also - does anyone have any two cents on 'Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, And Applications, R. Abraham, Jerrold E. Marsden, T. Ratiu' ?

Regards,
Thrillhouse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thrillhouse86 said:
Hey All,
I am an engineer, so I don't really care for a pure maths 'prove this' 'prove that' approach.

All right so basically you want to understand a heavily mathematical discipline without really trying to understand it.

If you even bothered to search google books for the book, which by the way is written by three mathematicians, you would notice that the first two chapters make up the backbone in an intro or intermediate analysis course. I wouldn't expect the proofs to just die down in the rest of the book.
 
Hey listen smart arse - firstly thanks for not answering my question, but just insulting me. Secondly I never said I didn't want to deal with maths - I said I didn't want to have to deal with pure maths. You should know that the level of mathematical rigour required by physicists and engineers is less than that required by mathematicians. The classical examples being Quantum Mechanics, where you can understand a lot of the material without relying on a detailed knowledge of functional analysis, or control theory where you can implement solutions without a detailed knowledge of optimisation theory.

Secondly all I wanted to know whether anyone here in a PHYSICS forum, could vouch for that Marsden et. al. book - Is a good book. I have checked it out on google books and noticed that it is very mathematical, and therefore very time consuming to go through, which is why I wanted to get peoples opinions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K